That would require unsoldering the pot and replacing it, to which I'm sure Gil would object. The bypass is reversible, no solder joint was broken in the process and no original part was removed.iiipopes wrote:You could have used a push-pull on the 5th knob and at least kept the option of the capacitor.
4005 gets the shunt!
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: 4005 gets the shunt!
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Re: 4005 gets the shunt!
I do see that point. And to comment on another post, yes, it is much closer to the bridge than a Jazz Bass bridge pickup; I'm surprised there is any output at all from the pickup due to there just not being any significant string excursion that close to the bridge.ilan wrote:That would require unsoldering the pot and replacing it, to which I'm sure Gil would object. The bypass is reversible, no solder joint was broken in the process and no original part was removed.iiipopes wrote:You could have used a push-pull on the 5th knob and at least kept the option of the capacitor.
- GoldenGloryOrn
- New member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:59 am
Re: 4005 gets the shunt!
But somehow it still works ...iiipopes wrote:I do see that point. And to comment on another post, yes, it is much closer to the bridge than a Jazz Bass bridge pickup; I'm surprised there is any output at all from the pickup due to there just not being any significant string excursion that close to the bridge.ilan wrote:That would require unsoldering the pot and replacing it, to which I'm sure Gil would object. The bypass is reversible, no solder joint was broken in the process and no original part was removed.iiipopes wrote:You could have used a push-pull on the 5th knob and at least kept the option of the capacitor.
Re: 4005 gets the shunt!
On the 4002, the inline capacitor to the bridge pickup is a .01. Maybe that would be a good idea on the 4005 also?
