Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by spongebob »

8mileshigher wrote:SpongeBob, you requested a picture of a FireGlo with a Hipshot.... this was my 2010 that came with a Hipshot, before I had the Original Ric tailpiece reinstalled, as I'm a traditionalist.
Close up.jpg
Nice one Rich, love it. Can't wait to get mine on! :D
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by woodyng »

daveman wrote:
pag wrote:There must be a valid reason why Hipshot use different metals in various editions of the same bridge . . .
Nah. It's just sales & marketing. They know that some people swear by brass, some prefer aluminum...etc... perhaps irrationally. It's easy enough for Hipshot to make them up in different materials once they have the design.
There is a weight difference,if nothing else. The aluminum hipshot weighs about the same as the zinc unit it replaced on my bass. Plus,having used a number of heavy brass bridges like the badass (1&2),i wanted to try to keep my bass sounding as much like original as i could.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by teeder »

I'm absolutely convinced I can hear the difference between zinc, aluminum and brass, with a high preference to aluminum.

Here's my old V63 (which may not exist today) when it had the Hipshot.

Image
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by sloop_john_b »

teeder wrote: Here's my old V63 (which may not exist today) when it had the Hipshot.
May not exist?
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by teeder »

Ya, the guy that bought it from me is in a Beatles tribute and was having it converted to "lefty".

I've asked numerous times for pictures of how it turned out, but no luck.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by jps »

Is this it?
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by teeder »

No, but this is! I asked again and he sent these.

I hope you're sitting down! :shock: :cry:
photo.JPG
photo 1.JPG
photo 2.JPG
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by cjj »

:shock: :shock: :shock:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by johnallg »

Wow.... interesting way to deal with the wing swapping...
User avatar
T28
Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 1:31 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by T28 »

What exactly is the advantage of going with the hipshot vs oem?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by jps »

Oh, my...............Good thing it wasn't a special bass or anything! Just a V series............:shock:
User avatar
qwezirider
Intermediate Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by qwezirider »

T28 wrote:What exactly is the advantage of going with the hipshot vs oem?
Easier to set intonation, for one thing. Although that doesn't often need to be done. For me, I just like the look of it much better. Plus, when going all black on a Jetglo, these are easier to find than a factory black tailpiece.
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by 8mileshigher »

cjj wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:
johnallg wrote:Wow.... interesting way to deal with the wing swapping...
jps wrote:Oh, my........Good thing it wasn't a special bass or anything! Just a V series.....:shock:
Guess I'm having a hard time understanding how those reversed body-wings make it more McCartney-like, especially with the standard right-handed (non C64) headstock shape. ? :? :? :?
Attachments
reversed.JPG
reversed.JPG (11.37 KiB) Viewed 1594 times
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by bassduke49 »

But that's it. The old lefties didn't have a reversed headstock - it was the standard headstock played upside down. What I don't understand is why he just didn't try to find a lefty C64 or a PMC version of the V63. Maybe they're just too scarce and expensive(?)
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
vax2002
New member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:45 am

Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?

Post by vax2002 »

I did try a Hipshot as one of my Black bridges had tail lift due to the last player using telegraph wires for strngs.

I found that during the gig, the saddles would pop over and you had to stop between songs and slide it back, what an absolute arse of a design I thought.
I took the old stock bridge, wrapped it in a tea towel and put it in a wood vice and quarter turned the handle daily, it came out flat again, put it back on and it has stayed put .

As for the hipshot unless they have addressed the saddle pop issue, they are not for me, soundwise, it did not sound any different, lack of sustain has never been an issue on Rickenbacker basses, in fact the opposite, sometimes you think you might have to shoot the damned thing to stop it ringing out sustain.
On a good day with new strings, they could give a grand piano a run for it's money.

This is it with the 4003, it is what it is, I would say the design was just a fluke, nobody knew in those days how they would sound with roundwound strings, but everybody does now and nothing can even get near.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”