Nice one Rich, love it. Can't wait to get mine on!8mileshigher wrote:SpongeBob, you requested a picture of a FireGlo with a Hipshot.... this was my 2010 that came with a Hipshot, before I had the Original Ric tailpiece reinstalled, as I'm a traditionalist.
Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
1974 (February) 4001 JG
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
There is a weight difference,if nothing else. The aluminum hipshot weighs about the same as the zinc unit it replaced on my bass. Plus,having used a number of heavy brass bridges like the badass (1&2),i wanted to try to keep my bass sounding as much like original as i could.daveman wrote:Nah. It's just sales & marketing. They know that some people swear by brass, some prefer aluminum...etc... perhaps irrationally. It's easy enough for Hipshot to make them up in different materials once they have the design.pag wrote:There must be a valid reason why Hipshot use different metals in various editions of the same bridge . . .
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
May not exist?teeder wrote: Here's my old V63 (which may not exist today) when it had the Hipshot.
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Ya, the guy that bought it from me is in a Beatles tribute and was having it converted to "lefty".
I've asked numerous times for pictures of how it turned out, but no luck.
I've asked numerous times for pictures of how it turned out, but no luck.
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Is this it?
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
No, but this is! I asked again and he sent these.
I hope you're sitting down!
I hope you're sitting down!
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Wow.... interesting way to deal with the wing swapping...
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
What exactly is the advantage of going with the hipshot vs oem?
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Oh, my...............Good thing it wasn't a special bass or anything! Just a V series............
- qwezirider
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
Easier to set intonation, for one thing. Although that doesn't often need to be done. For me, I just like the look of it much better. Plus, when going all black on a Jetglo, these are easier to find than a factory black tailpiece.T28 wrote:What exactly is the advantage of going with the hipshot vs oem?
- 8mileshigher
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm
Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
cjj wrote:![]()
![]()
johnallg wrote:Wow.... interesting way to deal with the wing swapping...
Guess I'm having a hard time understanding how those reversed body-wings make it more McCartney-like, especially with the standard right-handed (non C64) headstock shape. ?jps wrote:Oh, my........Good thing it wasn't a special bass or anything! Just a V series.....
- Attachments
-
- reversed.JPG (11.37 KiB) Viewed 1594 times
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
But that's it. The old lefties didn't have a reversed headstock - it was the standard headstock played upside down. What I don't understand is why he just didn't try to find a lefty C64 or a PMC version of the V63. Maybe they're just too scarce and expensive(?)
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Re: Going For A Hipshot - New 4003?
I did try a Hipshot as one of my Black bridges had tail lift due to the last player using telegraph wires for strngs.
I found that during the gig, the saddles would pop over and you had to stop between songs and slide it back, what an absolute arse of a design I thought.
I took the old stock bridge, wrapped it in a tea towel and put it in a wood vice and quarter turned the handle daily, it came out flat again, put it back on and it has stayed put .
As for the hipshot unless they have addressed the saddle pop issue, they are not for me, soundwise, it did not sound any different, lack of sustain has never been an issue on Rickenbacker basses, in fact the opposite, sometimes you think you might have to shoot the damned thing to stop it ringing out sustain.
On a good day with new strings, they could give a grand piano a run for it's money.
This is it with the 4003, it is what it is, I would say the design was just a fluke, nobody knew in those days how they would sound with roundwound strings, but everybody does now and nothing can even get near.
I found that during the gig, the saddles would pop over and you had to stop between songs and slide it back, what an absolute arse of a design I thought.
I took the old stock bridge, wrapped it in a tea towel and put it in a wood vice and quarter turned the handle daily, it came out flat again, put it back on and it has stayed put .
As for the hipshot unless they have addressed the saddle pop issue, they are not for me, soundwise, it did not sound any different, lack of sustain has never been an issue on Rickenbacker basses, in fact the opposite, sometimes you think you might have to shoot the damned thing to stop it ringing out sustain.
On a good day with new strings, they could give a grand piano a run for it's money.
This is it with the 4003, it is what it is, I would say the design was just a fluke, nobody knew in those days how they would sound with roundwound strings, but everybody does now and nothing can even get near.

