4003s/5 new tuning
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- rickomania1970
- Junior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:22 pm
- Contact:
4003s/5 new tuning
i'm thinking to use E-A-D-G-C or D-G-C-F-A instead of low B tuning.i have a 1997 4003S/5 and can not sure the other tunings are ideal for my blue beast
are the other tunings good and which gauges must i use for them if i can tune ? i'm thinking TI Powerbass 5 string set which has 0.47-119 gauges.
RiCK-O-MANiA
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
I dont know about the gauges off the top of my head but i put a high c on a 5 and loved it!
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
I've used a couple of non-Rick six string basses for years (wish RIC would make one!
) and always use a 0.32 gauge string for the top C string.
Ash
Ash
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
- rickomania1970
- Junior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Ash most of other brands are making suitable basses for 5 & 6 strings and you can change the tuning simply
5str basses of rickenbacker (especially S5) are exellent basses but seems more delicate for changing tuning i think.i want to learn if i'm mistaken and how can i change the tuning due to avoiding to use -useless- lowB string 
RiCK-O-MANiA
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13194
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
The low B wasn't useless when Da Blue Beast was mine!rickomania1970 wrote:to avoiding to use -useless- lowB string
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
- rickomania1970
- Junior Member
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
RiCK-O-MANiA
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
I would really miss a low B in my EDM projects. But in jazz, I actually prefer a high C, as I've tried low B there and it just overwhelms everything else unless you are dealing with a full sound setup. I'm lazy anyway so the high C makes soloing much simpler. It's context-dependent for sure.
A .035'' high C would probably be fine. A little more tension than matches a .045'' G, but the extra girth is probably needed to keep the string extra "present" in the mix.
A .035'' high C would probably be fine. A little more tension than matches a .045'' G, but the extra girth is probably needed to keep the string extra "present" in the mix.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13194
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Oh okay, I gotcha. You mean these guitarists didn't use 8 string guitars?! SLACKERS! 
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Sounds like you gotta try a six-string bass Rhys - the chordal possibilities, particularly with jazz, will astound you, but you can still retain that low root at the same time!cassius987 wrote:I would really miss a low B in my EDM projects. But in jazz, I actually prefer a high C, as I've tried low B there and it just overwhelms everything else unless you are dealing with a full sound setup. I'm lazy anyway so the high C makes soloing much simpler. It's context-dependent for sure.
A .035'' high C would probably be fine. A little more tension than matches a .045'' G, but the extra girth is probably needed to keep the string extra "present" in the mix.
Ash
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Why stop at 6 strings?Ashgray wrote:Sounds like you gotta try a six-string bass Rhys - the chordal possibilities, particularly with jazz, will astound you, but you can still retain that low root at the same time!cassius987 wrote:I would really miss a low B in my EDM projects. But in jazz, I actually prefer a high C, as I've tried low B there and it just overwhelms everything else unless you are dealing with a full sound setup. I'm lazy anyway so the high C makes soloing much simpler. It's context-dependent for sure.
A .035'' high C would probably be fine. A little more tension than matches a .045'' G, but the extra girth is probably needed to keep the string extra "present" in the mix.![]()
Ash
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
I have played a few 6s. I guess I just don't see the need (yet)--I am just happier adapting the strings as needed and sticking with a neck profile I really like. I once played a 6er with 19 mm spacing and oddly enough it was the most comfy, but it was several thousand above my price range! I don't remember the builder's name... Ursine maybe? EDIT: I think Google got it right for me, it was a Surine. Some guy at a shop let me try it while he tried my 4001FL out.Ashgray wrote:Sounds like you gotta try a six-string bass Rhys - the chordal possibilities, particularly with jazz, will astound you, but you can still retain that low root at the same time!cassius987 wrote:I would really miss a low B in my EDM projects. But in jazz, I actually prefer a high C, as I've tried low B there and it just overwhelms everything else unless you are dealing with a full sound setup. I'm lazy anyway so the high C makes soloing much simpler. It's context-dependent for sure.
A .035'' high C would probably be fine. A little more tension than matches a .045'' G, but the extra girth is probably needed to keep the string extra "present" in the mix.![]()
Ash
Still, what 6ers would you recommend?
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
As to EADGC tuning -- I have that on my 4004cii convert, and I've found that I have to use extra-light gauge strings because the neck can't take anything heavier. My 4005s/5 is in standard 5-string tuning (albeit with a low A, not low B) but its neck has also proven to be very touchy, and I can't go heavier than medium gauges. (e.g., a .042 for the G). So I can't concur with the recommendation of a .035 or even .032 for a C string; if I used that on mine, it would quickly turn into a bow and arrow! I use a D'Addario XL .028 for the C string.
However, the neck on your 4003s/5 may be tougher; experiment & see. Just beware that all gauges between manufacturers are not equal! For example, GHS strings are higher tension than their equivalently gauged D'Addarios.
As for the 6, I have a Carvin LB-76, and while I find it to be well-balanced, its string spacing comfortable (17mm, I think, but it's also adjustable), and its neck nicely slim compared to other 6's (2" at the nut), ultimately my left wrist gets tired from my having to reach all the way across the fretboard to play the low string! So I also have taken to playing two 5's in the two different tunings. Doubles the load but halves the discomfort . . .
However, the neck on your 4003s/5 may be tougher; experiment & see. Just beware that all gauges between manufacturers are not equal! For example, GHS strings are higher tension than their equivalently gauged D'Addarios.
As for the 6, I have a Carvin LB-76, and while I find it to be well-balanced, its string spacing comfortable (17mm, I think, but it's also adjustable), and its neck nicely slim compared to other 6's (2" at the nut), ultimately my left wrist gets tired from my having to reach all the way across the fretboard to play the low string! So I also have taken to playing two 5's in the two different tunings. Doubles the load but halves the discomfort . . .
"Music so wishes to be heard that sometimes it calls on unlikely characters to give it voice, and ears." -- Robert Fripp
1976 4001, ivoried White
1997 4003s/5, Jetglo
2003 4004Cii"/5", Mapleglo
1976 4001, ivoried White
1997 4003s/5, Jetglo
2003 4004Cii"/5", Mapleglo
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Luck of the draw I guess -- my 4003 that was converted to a 5er by Paul Wilczynski handles a medium tension BEADG set no problem.
Re: 4003s/5 new tuning
Most B strings are too floppy for me. I have need for the low notes occasionally, and only the occasional pattern that the low string facilitates. So I have been tuning up the low B to C and I get much more definition of tone and intonation. The end result is CEADG.
