Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?

johnhall · Post by **johnhall** » Fri May 02, 2014 5:42 pm

Once again, my opinion and that of a certain number of others, is that it looks correct from the front of the instrument. I will agree that from behind (which of course an audience rarely sees) it does look slightly odd. Personally, what REALLY looks strange to me are some Ibanez and Warwick heads but these are also probably the way they are for ergonomic reasons as well. To each their own.

jps · Post by **jps** » Fri May 02, 2014 6:10 pm

How about these for some interesting tuning key layouts?

http://musicvox.com/products.html

bassduke49 · Post by **bassduke49** » Fri May 02, 2014 6:24 pm

jps wrote:How about these for some interesting tuning key layouts?

http://musicvox.com/products.html

Eewww! Talk about donkey dongs!

edski · Post by **edski** » Fri May 02, 2014 6:44 pm

jps wrote:How about these for some interesting tuning key layouts?

http://musicvox.com/products.html

Now don't think I'll be eating dinner. Thanks!

Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?

Re: Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?

Re: Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?

Re: Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?

Re: Cock-eyed tuner on a 4003 MapleGlo - is this suspicious?