Let's stop the serial number madness

Ashgray · Post by **Ashgray** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:00 am

8mileshigh wrote:Yep. A long time coming - if it's the guy I'm thinking of.

Knowing of the work that you have had done by a certain "luthier", I'm sure it is both a long time coming and the same guy.

Ash

admin · Post by **admin** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:01 am

Yes there have been bloopers that are memorable. I thank you for your sense of humour and contribution. Learning from one another is a rewarding experience.

8mileshigh · Post by **8mileshigh** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:08 am

Hey look! We all make mistakes!! LOL

jwilli · Post by **jwilli** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:19 pm

Well, if we're voting, I say to keep it the way its been since the Register's beginning.

Colonel Sanders · Post by **Colonel Sanders** » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:37 pm

8mileshigh wrote:Yeah one of my basses came back with a different serial number on it after restoration. It had gone from a 68 to a 96! LOL

It got sorted out though.

I have two basses in the hand of this guy and I am a tad worried.

Ashgray · Post by **Ashgray** » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:56 pm

You should be - get 'em back!

Ash

Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness

Re: Let's stop the serial number madness