4001 internal routing

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

4001 internal routing

Post by rikk »

Looking at the routing of two 4001's today and noticed the 1979 has the circular cuts for the channel between the neck pickup and the main cavity. The 1978 has a smooth cut. So it looks like there was not a definitive stop for the circular cuts and they were possibly doing both at the same time. Does anybody know when they stopped the circular cuts and started the smooth cuts?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by johnallg »

Rikk, it is possible the one with the rounded hole rout was a leftover from earlier production and it was finally finished and sold.
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by rikk »

It's very possible that the '79 is a leftover body. But it's a jetglow. Nothing out of the ordinary. I would love to hear what kind of routing others have on '78 or '79 4001's.
User avatar
Wiker
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:08 pm

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by Wiker »

My 1979 Autumnglo (in the process of being refinished at the moment), original routing except for the little extra to get the neck pickup to the 1/2" position.
Image
Gilmourisgod
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:26 am

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by Gilmourisgod »

I always wondered why the neck pickup route is so huge in comparison to the size of the pickup? The depth would allow for adjustment up and down, but what was the thinking on the width? It seems like a lot of wood to remove unnecessarily at the neck/body joint. Gorgeous refin job BTW.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by johnallg »

Gilmourisgod wrote:I always wondered why the neck pickup route is so huge in comparison to the size of the pickup? The depth would allow for adjustment up and down, but what was the thinking on the width? It seems like a lot of wood to remove unnecessarily at the neck/body joint. Gorgeous refin job BTW.
Yup, me too.
User avatar
Lefty4003S8
Intermediate Member
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:05 am

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by Lefty4003S8 »

johnallg wrote:
Gilmourisgod wrote:I always wondered why the neck pickup route is so huge in comparison to the size of the pickup? The depth would allow for adjustment up and down, but what was the thinking on the width? It seems like a lot of wood to remove unnecessarily at the neck/body joint. Gorgeous refin job BTW.
Yup, me too.

If I'm not mistaken, that wide routing was called the "Lemmy Option"....you know...in case you wanted to install a Gibson Mudbucker..... :D :mrgreen: :D
Do not drink from the toilet when taking Lyrica
User avatar
HofnerVox
New member
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:40 am

Re: 4001 internal routing

Post by HofnerVox »

Lefty4003S8 wrote:
johnallg wrote:
Gilmourisgod wrote:I always wondered why the neck pickup route is so huge in comparison to the size of the pickup? The depth would allow for adjustment up and down, but what was the thinking on the width? It seems like a lot of wood to remove unnecessarily at the neck/body joint. Gorgeous refin job BTW.
Yup, me too.

If I'm not mistaken, that wide routing was called the "Lemmy Option"....you know...in case you wanted to install a Gibson Mudbucker..... :D :mrgreen: :D
Yeah I read the same thing somewhere myself.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”