Thoughts On This Please!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by thx1955 »

Why limit yourself, you can always at some point get a new, or a really good used modern one, but, a decent 70's model is worth looking at, and getting
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by jps »

thx1955 wrote:Why limit yourself, you can always at some point get a new, or a really good used modern one, but, a decent 70's model is worth looking at, and getting
+1. I love the modern Ricks (we all need some in our collection) but there is something special about a 4001, especially those made up to the mid '70s.
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by squirebass »

jps wrote:
thx1955 wrote:Why limit yourself, you can always at some point get a new, or a really good used modern one, but, a decent 70's model is worth looking at, and getting
+1. I love the modern Ricks (we all need some in our collection) but there is something special about a 4001, especially those made up to the mid '70s.
My '73 sounded nothing like either of my v63s or a modern Rick, and the feel of the neck was different as well. All three are Ricks, and quite good, but all different in their own way... A 70s skunk-striped RIck is a totally different animal, and nice to have....
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by jps »

What could be better than having a 4001? Having two (or more) of them! :D
Attachments
Jeff_4498_800.jpg
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by thx1955 »

jps wrote:What could be better than having a 4001? Having two (or more) of them! :D
Long as they're:
4-fullsize.jpg
Fireglo !!!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by spongebob »

I did make a little offer, which the seller has declined - but I'm on the list should he change his mind at any time.

So we'll see.... :D
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by thx1955 »

squirebass wrote:
jps wrote:
thx1955 wrote:Why limit yourself, you can always at some point get a new, or a really good used modern one, but, a decent 70's model is worth looking at, and getting
+1. I love the modern Ricks (we all need some in our collection) but there is something special about a 4001, especially those made up to the mid '70s.
My '73 sounded nothing like either of my v63s or a modern Rick, and the feel of the neck was different as well. All three are Ricks, and quite good, but all different in their own way... A 70s skunk-striped RIck is a totally different animal, and nice to have....
+1 I got my "73" on Friday and waited till Saturday to unpack, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the difference. I've owned and Played Ric's for over 40 years and this 73 is the nicest sounding by far of all my RIc's, the neck and action are lovely, and the sound is powerful and rich, this one is going to get a lot of playing time
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by squirebass »

+1 I got my "73" on Friday and waited till Saturday to unpack, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the difference. I've owned and Played Ric's for over 40 years and this 73 is the nicest sounding by far of all my RIc's, the neck and action are lovely, and the sound is powerful and rich, this one is going to get a lot of playing time[/quote]


Thanks Jim, for your kind words.... but now you need to post pics!!
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by thx1955 »

squirebass wrote:+1 I got my "73" on Friday and waited till Saturday to unpack, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the difference. I've owned and Played Ric's for over 40 years and this 73 is the nicest sounding by far of all my RIc's, the neck and action are lovely, and the sound is powerful and rich, this one is going to get a lot of playing time


Thanks Jim, for your kind words.... but now you need to post pics!!
Here you go ...

2-fullsize.jpg
5-fullsize.jpg
Attachments
4-fullsize.jpg
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by jps »

That looks like the redhead sister to my blond. They are fabulous basses. :D
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by squirebass »

thx1955 wrote:
squirebass wrote:+1 I got my "73" on Friday and waited till Saturday to unpack, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the difference. I've owned and Played Ric's for over 40 years and this 73 is the nicest sounding by far of all my RIc's, the neck and action are lovely, and the sound is powerful and rich, this one is going to get a lot of playing time


Thanks Jim, for your kind words.... but now you need to post pics!!
Here you go ...

2-fullsize.jpg
5-fullsize.jpg
Lordamighty, that is a nice bass! Beautiful Fireglo, with ALL the fixin's....

Very nice!
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Thoughts On This Please!

Post by thx1955 »

squirebass wrote:
thx1955 wrote:
squirebass wrote:+1 I got my "73" on Friday and waited till Saturday to unpack, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the difference. I've owned and Played Ric's for over 40 years and this 73 is the nicest sounding by far of all my RIc's, the neck and action are lovely, and the sound is powerful and rich, this one is going to get a lot of playing time


Thanks Jim, for your kind words.... but now you need to post pics!!
Here you go ...

The attachment 2-fullsize.jpg is no longer available
The attachment 5-fullsize.jpg is no longer available
Lordamighty, that is a nice bass! Beautiful Fireglo, with ALL the fixin's....

Very nice!
And she sounds as good as she looks, better even ... the only goodie it doesn't have is crushed MoP inlay, other than that it's got all the good stuff, split bridge,
IMG_0008.JPG

chequered binding,
10-fullsize.jpg

full width inlays,
6-fullsize.jpg

closed Grover machine heads (still in great working order,
12-fullsize.jpg


and, surprisingly enough, she has absolutely zero, I mean none, not a trace of tail lift, the rear of the bridge is flush with the body.

IMG_0046.JPG
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”