Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Fred Mertz
New member
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:45 pm

Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by Fred Mertz »

I've been using Fender 9050ML's flatwounds on my P Basses and jazz basses for about 40 years. I'm guessing that the 4003s should use a lighter set. I have a 9050L set waiting for my new bass to show up. I have used Pyramids in the past but don't like the feel. Looking for string suggestions that would not require truss rod adjustment.

Suggestions?

Dave
Fred Mertz

runs with scissors......
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by jps »

TI Jazz Flats. Wonderful feel and tone.
bassman4001
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:36 am
Contact:

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by bassman4001 »

I have a set of Ernie Ball Slinky flats on the way...hope I like'em. They're the new cobalt ones released at NAMM this year
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by cjj »

I've been likin' LaBella Deep Talkin' Bass flats, .045, .065, .085, .105 Stainless Steel...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by cassius987 »

TIs seem to do really well on some basses and awful on others. But when they work, they really work.

Fender 9050L flats are GREAT on a Ric. I have recorded with this and they track beautifully; they might be the easiest strings to mix, ever. But their tone is not nuanced.

I also like the lowest gauge set of LaBella DTFs.
User avatar
fran4001
Intermediate Member
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by fran4001 »

Thomastik Infeld JF344 Jazz Flats. Sublime. I have them on 15 basses, two of which are Ricks. :D
Apr. '73 4001JG, Jun. '73 4001MG, Feb. '75 4001 WBT, Feb. '00 4001CS
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by woodyng »

The '72 4000 i recently got ( :mrgreen: ) came with a new set of Labella Low tension flatwounds,a relatively new offering from the company. I forget the exact gauge,but they're in the 40-100 ballpark. They are absolutely fabulous strings,supersmooth,slinky,with a perfect tension,and a great sound. I'm actually digging them more than my 60's maxima set,as they seem to have a bit more bark. They sound fab with a pick,or played fingerstyle.
User avatar
donhank
New member
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:59 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by donhank »

woodyng wrote:The '72 4000 i recently got ( :mrgreen: ) came with a new set of Labella Low tension flatwounds,a relatively new offering from the company. I forget the exact gauge,but they're in the 40-100 ballpark. They are absolutely fabulous strings,supersmooth,slinky,with a perfect tension,and a great sound.
A quick comparison:

guage tension guage tension guage tension guage tension set total
LaBella Low Tension Flexible Flats 100 34.20 70 30.50 56 34.00 42 36.20 134.90
TI JR344 89 27.99 68 29.54 51 30.20 43 34.61 122.34


The LaBellas are a little darker sounding than the TIs but still a good choice.

Woody . . . I also use the Labellas on my other instrument - a koa neck-thru Peavey Unity series. Didn't you once own one of these ??
User avatar
DavyR
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by DavyR »

donhank wrote:
A quick comparison:

guage tension guage tension guage tension guage tension set total
LaBella Low Tension Flexible Flats 100 34.20 70 30.50 56 34.00 42 36.20 134.90
TI JR344 89 27.99 68 29.54 51 30.20 43 34.61 122.34


The LaBellas are a little darker sounding than the TIs but still a good choice.
Is there a set number for these new LaBella Low Tension Flats or is this what they are referred to as? Thanks!
User avatar
Wiker
Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:08 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by Wiker »

DavyR wrote:
donhank wrote:
A quick comparison:

guage tension guage tension guage tension guage tension set total
LaBella Low Tension Flexible Flats 100 34.20 70 30.50 56 34.00 42 36.20 134.90
TI JR344 89 27.99 68 29.54 51 30.20 43 34.61 122.34


The LaBellas are a little darker sounding than the TIs but still a good choice.
Is there a set number for these new LaBella Low Tension Flats or is this what they are referred to as? Thanks!
La Bella LTF-4A, http://www.labella.com/products/ltf-4a
Tension listed as 134.9 lbs.

TI JR-344 are round wounds.
TI JF-344 flat wounds are listed as 140.19 lbs.

http://www.thestringguy.com/tension.html is the only place I’ve found
any measures for Pyramid Gold flats, 164.9 lbs.
User avatar
donhank
New member
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:59 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by donhank »

Two other popular sets that I tried:


- - - - -TI JF344 100 34.39 70 31.30 56 37.47 43 37.03 140.19
-D'Addario super light ECB80 95 36.20 75 42.58 60 46.49 40 37.83 163.10
User avatar
songdog
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by songdog »

Have you ever considered nylon tape wounds? I've never tried them on my 4001 (Rotosounds forever!) but I've settled on GHS black nylon tape wounds (set 3060) as my favorite strings for my Fender fretless. Gauges are 50-70-90-105, they seem to be fairly low tension.

I originally tried them on a whim, expecting they would be dark and toneless. They turned out to have plenty of tone to work with, maybe because there's a light-gauge roundwound string under the nylon wrap.

I also tried the La Bella white nylon tape wounds (50-65-85-105), somehow didn't like them as much.
Turn on, tune up, rock out!
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by woodyng »

donhank wrote: The LaBellas are a little darker sounding than the TIs but still a good choice.
Woody . . . I also use the Labellas on my other instrument - a koa neck-thru Peavey Unity series. Didn't you once own one of these ??
I did indeed used to own a Koa Peavey Unity bass,with an ebony fretboard. I ripped all the PV active eclectronics and pickups out,and installed passive seymour Duncan PJ pickups of some kind. (It's been a decade or so,ago,so memory fails..) Great body/neck on that,i should have kept it. I had it strung BEAD,and the low notes on it were brilliant. Pretty sure i was using DR Sunbeams on it,which seem to sound great no matter what bass i put them on.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by woodyng »

songdog wrote:Have you ever considered nylon tape wounds? I've never tried them on my 4001 (Rotosounds forever!) but I've settled on GHS black nylon tape wounds (set 3060) as my favorite strings for my Fender fretless. Gauges are 50-70-90-105, they seem to be fairly low tension.
I also tried the La Bella white nylon tape wounds (50-65-85-105), somehow didn't like them as much.
In recent years,i've tried Rotosound tapewounds,(not bad,a little stiff/high tensiony for my taste),as well as Labella's classic black tapes (great URB sound on a fretless),as well as both varieties of Labella White tapewounds on several fretted and fretless basses. I think i prefer the black tapes for fretless,but the white strings sounded great on a Carvin Ac50 fretted,and an Italia Rimini,also fretted. The White tape/copperwounds i have on my defretted Cii seem to be lacking in fundamental,so i am thinking of replacing them with a set of the classic tapewounds.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Re: Which flatwounds for new 4003s?

Post by edski »

I used Fender 9050 ML's for a long time on my 4001 - the neck had a bit too much bow, but oh boy was the sound explosive. I would guess the better truss rods of a 4003 would be better suited for those bridge cables (I still have the old 9050 ML's on my Ibanez - they make that bass sing!).

I don't know what the difference is between the newer 9050's (green packaging I think) as opposed to the older ones I have (brown packaging).

Currently I have GHS Brite Flats on my 4001 and the custom fretless...seriously thinking of putting them on the Laredo (but I would suggest getting the string gauges as close to Ric specs as possible). Been thinking of the GHS flats for the fretless when it gets to be time for new strings on that one...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”