4001S 64

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Captain Bob
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: 4001S 64

Post by Captain Bob »

Thank you, Brian and Paul! You both always share your vast amounts of knowledge.
4003S Mapleglo
jerzy
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:11 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by jerzy »

Are the parts original and is it a Rose Morris or not ?
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by bassduke49 »

Don't know about the internals; I'll let experts weigh in on that. Whether it was an RM 1999 or not depends on its history. Only difference is the serial and a boat ride. If you or the bass is in the UK or Australia, then it is more likely an RM 1999. Usually the collectors of RM's have figured out the serials involved, but I am not such an expert on that. It does seem that most down-trimmed twin-pickup Rick basses made between 1964 and '67 were exported to Rose-Morris. Rickenbacker never really listed this model on its price sheets in the U.S., although it could have been ordered by customers. For more on this, see the book! :D
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
Ontario_RIC_fan
Advanced Member
Posts: 2797
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:39 pm

Re: 4001S 64

Post by Ontario_RIC_fan »

jerzy wrote:Are the parts original and is it a Rose Morris or not ?
Sambor:

You are in Europe?

Your bass fits into the run of the first 1999 basses sent to Rose Morris in March 1964. That is not definitive, but best guess is it is a RoMo 1999. Same bass no matter what you call it, as Paul has noted.

Last year, RIC CEO John Hall had the Rose Morris file on his desk for a bit and was able to answer this question for a few specific instruments. For example we learned that DA 09, another bass just like yours but made in January 64, and currently residing in Ireland was not part of the Rose Morris run. Hence it must have been sold in the US or Canada as a 4001S.

John told me by email at the time that only one DA bass was part of a shipment of 5 instruments (4 guitars and a bass) Electro Strings shipped to the UK for photographs/publicity purpose and that the SN for the bass was lower then DA 09. So any bass prior to DC (other then one) was not a Rose Morris export model, but must have been sold in North America.

Sadly John has not been posting here lately. A post on the RIC corporate forum might give you a definitive answer.

More pics - - the whole bass, front and back, the tuners, headstock front and back, would be welcome by me anyway. :D

I never get tired of looking at pictures of Vintage RICS. :mrgreen:

You are very lucky to own a bass like that. What does it sound like?
Brian Morton
A Rickenbacker Fan
in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
=========================
67 FG 625
74 JG 4000
76 JG 430
77 JG 620
77 JG 320
79 MG 450
79 JG 4001
80 FG 620/12
81 BG 480
91 JG 610
02 BG 620
78 TR7
83 TR25
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4001S 64

Post by aceonbass »

The pots are the early CTS with the dished back. By '65 these looked the same as the current CTS pots from RIC. The wire from C3 to C3 on the volume pots is not original, and someone has used a white vinyl insulated wire to replace the original turquois .0047uF bass cut cap for the bridge pickup. There's a non original red vinyl insulated wire coming from the mute assembly that should be soldered to the back of one of the pots, but isn't. I'm guessing it's soldered to a ground on the output jack assembly.
User avatar
fran4001
Intermediate Member
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:25 pm
Contact:

Re: 4001S 64

Post by fran4001 »

Great reading, Brian and Dane! And thanks for the CTS info. I only asked because I have lots of experience with 50's and 60's CTS pots as used in vintage Fenders, and for whatever reason, even at the same 250k or 500k values, it seems I've never seen a dish-back CTS used in a Fender. Cool!
Apr. '73 4001JG, Jun. '73 4001MG, Feb. '75 4001 WBT, Feb. '00 4001CS
User avatar
Captain Bob
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: 4001S 64

Post by Captain Bob »

Sambor, if you end up with this bass, Dane Wilder, who posted above about your wiring loom is the fellow you need to have rebuild it correctly when you're ready. I have three of his harnesses, one of which is installed in my '64 4001S.
4003S Mapleglo
jerzy
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:11 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by jerzy »

Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:
jerzy wrote:Are the parts original and is it a Rose Morris or not ?
Sambor:

You are in Europe?

Your bass fits into the run of the first 1999 basses sent to Rose Morris in March 1964. That is not definitive, but best guess is it is a RoMo 1999. Same bass no matter what you call it, as Paul has noted.

Last year, RIC CEO John Hall had the Rose Morris file on his desk for a bit and was able to answer this question for a few specific instruments. For example we learned that DA 09, another bass just like yours but made in January 64, and currently residing in Ireland was not part of the Rose Morris run. Hence it must have been sold in the US or Canada as a 4001S.

John told me by email at the time that only one DA bass was part of a shipment of 5 instruments (4 guitars and a bass) Electro Strings shipped to the UK for photographs/publicity purpose and that the SN for the bass was lower then DA 09. So any bass prior to DC (other then one) was not a Rose Morris export model, but must have been sold in North America.

Sadly John has not been posting here lately. A post on the RIC corporate forum might give you a definitive answer.

More pics - - the whole bass, front and back, the tuners, headstock front and back, would be welcome by me anyway. :D

I never get tired of looking at pictures of Vintage RICS. :mrgreen:

You are very lucky to own a bass like that. What does it sound like?
Hello Brian,

Yes, I'm in France.
The Bass sounds great. Very punchy. But only the horseshoe is working.
Here some more pics.
P1010008.JPG
P1010006.JPG
P1010005.JPG
P1010003.JPG
P1010002.JPG
P1010001.JPG
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by woodyng »

That is just a splendid-looking speciman,and more than likely "the grail" for me. Hard to say,since i've never actually held one in my hands. But i hear they're nice.... :D
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by teeder »

Very nice, indeed!
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by cheyenne »

You got yourself a Grail there my friend. And you say that the neck is straight? Added bonus. :D
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
Ontario_RIC_fan
Advanced Member
Posts: 2797
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:39 pm

Re: 4001S 64

Post by Ontario_RIC_fan »

Lovely images Sambor:

My thanks for sharing them...

A 60s era Toaster is expensive but not impossible to find - it is the same as the ones used on guitars. Is the pick up dead or is there an issue with the wiring harness?
Brian Morton
A Rickenbacker Fan
in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
=========================
67 FG 625
74 JG 4000
76 JG 430
77 JG 620
77 JG 320
79 MG 450
79 JG 4001
80 FG 620/12
81 BG 480
91 JG 610
02 BG 620
78 TR7
83 TR25
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by jps »

jerzy wrote:
Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:
jerzy wrote:Yes, I'm in France.
The Bass sounds great. Very punchy. But only the horseshoe is working.
RRF member Sergio Silva lives in Portugal and does pickup repair/rewinding. He can certainly help your toaster pickup get back to working order.

Look in the section Winding Up With The Best for more.
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by Kopfjaeger »

Sambor,

She looks like a player!! Love the wear in all the right places!! You got yourself a keeper there, unless you are looking to sell. There would be a few interested takers, I imagine! 8)

Similar wear on my 1965 4001.
36.jpg
Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Re: 4001S 64

Post by bottom4 »

Kopfjaeger wrote:Sambor,

She looks like a player!! Love the wear in all the right places!! You got yourself a keeper there, unless you are looking to sell. There would be a few interested takers
36.jpg
Sepp
Yep and I'm not too far away in Germany... ;-)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”