"Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

gregw9
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:39 am

"Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by gregw9 »

I've had some time to compare the pre-scatterwound "hot" toasters from the 90's to the new scatterwound toasters on contemporary Ricks. I had a '98 660/12 to compare with a '15 1993+; and, a '96 325V63 to compare with a '15 350V63.

I've compared the guitars on my AC-15 and Fender Mustang amps at various volume levels and settings, and with different effects. My OPINION - that is, to my ear - the scatterwounds sound better on the 12's, with more jangle and chime. The hot toasters sound better on the 6 string guitar. The 325V63 drives the amp better and works better with overdrive and distortion. The 350V63 with the new toasters sounds good clean and strumming chords. For anything more aggressive the 325 with the hot ones sounds better.

Again, just my opinion. The 660/12 sounds great, but the 1993+ sounds magnificent. The 325V63 rocks, and the 350V63 jangles. I recently sold the 660/12. If I were to sell one of the 6's I'd sell the 350V63 and hang on to the 325V63.
Now:
'96 325V63
'98 660/12 FG
'15 1993+

Then:
'66 330 FG; '75 430; '76 3000 JG; '91 325V59 MG; '92 325V63; '96 330 JG; '96 360/12 MG; '00 360/6 CW; '00 360/12 CW; '02 650D; '03 380L
User avatar
IHeartRics
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
Contact:

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by IHeartRics »

Totally agree that the hot toasters sound great on 6's but not so hot on 12's.
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
User avatar
Medicus1963
Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 7:24 am

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by Medicus1963 »

Hello,
i agree not completely! Basically i made the same experience, but you can not compare the short scale 325 with the regular scale 350. I think the sound is Never the same even with the same pickups! and i had several 325 and 350 guitars to compare.

regards
Peter
All you need is love and a rick !
User avatar
wmthor
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:14 am

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by wmthor »

IHeartRics wrote:Totally agree that the hot toasters sound great on 6's but not so hot on 12's.
I'm yet another one in the camp that agrees that the "hot toasters" sound great on a six string ('96 1997 LH MG) while the scatterwounds sound great on a 12 string ('00 360/12 CW LH FG.)
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by iiipopes »

IHeartRics wrote:Totally agree that the hot toasters sound great on 6's but not so hot on 12's.
Agreed. The reason is that the "hot" toasters, with more winds, have more inductance. This has the effect of boosting perceived mids, which may be desireable, depending on the player's repertoire, but at the same time with intra-coil capacitance, lowering highs. Again, may be desireable from a lead guitar perspective, depending on the player's repertoire, but the combination of more mids and less highs is the antithesis of what the vast majority of players look for in a Rick 12 - the jangle - less mids, sparkling highs.
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4871
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

"Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by 8mileshigher »

wmthor wrote:
IHeartRics wrote:Totally agree that the hot toasters sound great on 6's but not so hot on 12's.
I'm yet another one in the camp that agrees that the "hot toasters" sound great on a six string while the scatterwounds sound great on a 12 string
I agree with Chip and Richard that the Scatterwounds sound better on the 12-stringers for the jangle and the Hot Toasters compliment the 6-stringers better. :)
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by JakeK »

I've played many Rickenbackers, 6-strings and 12-strings, and have owned a fair share of them as well. All of the past ones I've owned have had "hot" toasters. As far as the "not mine" Ricks, both 12 and 6 strings, have had both sets of toasters.

The hot-toasters work well for a 6-string because there is an added presence of mid-range and bass, which lend themselves to playing with some sort of dirt in the signal, be it an overdrive, vintage fuzz-tone, a meet-in-the-middle sounding distortion or even just a turned-up tube amp. Hi-gains are also good for dirty tones (hence the name, Hi-GAIN, I guess), but the hot toasters have always been a perfect compromise. They do that pretty clean thing fairly well, too, but they are also great for playing heavy. An extremely versatile pickup that cuts through a mix nicely. With the lower impedance and lack of mids on the scatterwound toasters, a good dirty sound will be a little harder to dial in. When you do get it just right, it can sound pretty good. While *I* like the sound of an overdriven scatterwound, most (non forum members/Rick players) don't. Many folks in the Ric community will agree with me. That said, while an overdriven Scat sounds good, it's no match for and easier to obtain with the hot toasters.

The scatterwounds have less so, but I don't really finding myself playing a fuzzed out 12-string that much (I'm NOT saying that it cannot be done, I simply just don't do it). Scatterwounds are good for playing cleanly and it's very easy to dial in a pleasing clean tone on your amp with scatterwound toasters. With hot toasters on a 12, it's a little harder, but it can still be done.

My point: I'm pretty much in the same boat with everyone who posted thus far that hot toasters are best for 6-string and Scats are better for 12-string.

Best 6-string I've played: 1986 1997 with hot toasters (I also owned this guitar for 5 years)
Best 12-string I've played: 2000 360/12 Carl Wilson signature with Scats (owned by a forumite)

Dream 6-string: I want my 1997 back!
Dream 12-string: a special two-pickup 1993Plus
User avatar
girllennon76
New member
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:49 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by girllennon76 »

I never had the chance to play scatterwounds and probably wouldn't want to. For RRF members not in the loop, I am the former owner of the 325v63 Greg is referring to. I've lived and breathed that guitar's tone for 14 years and always preferred a bit of drive and distortion when I played it. I could get clean sounds, but there's something about driven hot toasters that makes you want to play more. It's actually a very versatile little guitar and you can get some decent blues and jazz colors from it. too. Just noodle with amp settings and balance the guitar accordingly to taste. When I played with my occasional jam group (not a gig, just in someone's living room), I used nothing more than a reverb tank and a small Vox amp. Simple set up but pure heaven.

I hope to one day get it back because playing anything other than a Ric is uninspiring at best.
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by wim »

I had very hot toasters in my 6 string 360 V64 and I didn't care much for them as they made the guitar sound like a cheap knokoff.
Very muddy, not brilliant at all.
Maybe better for heavy distorted sounds, with the higher gain, but then there are far more better configurations around to do that.
They were about 15K ohm

It was even too fat to fit in the cover

before:
Image

after:
Image
User avatar
IHeartRics
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
Contact:

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by IHeartRics »

JakeK wrote:.... While *I* like the sound of an overdriven scatterwound, most (non forum members/Rick players) don't. Many folks in the Ric community will agree with me. That said, while an overdriven Scat sounds good, it's no match for and easier to obtain with the hot toasters.

The scatterwounds have less so, but I don't really finding myself playing a fuzzed out 12-string that much (I'm NOT saying that it cannot be done, I simply just don't do it). Scatterwounds are good for playing cleanly and it's very easy to dial in a pleasing clean tone on your amp with scatterwound toasters.
I actually play my 12 with the scatterwounds with a Rat distortion through my 50 watt Hiwatt. It sounds awesome. With the hot toasters it was kinda muddy and lacked clarity.
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by squirebass »

So, what would a 2014 350v63 have on it, scats or hot toasters?
User avatar
Ric5150
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 11:31 am

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by Ric5150 »

squirebass wrote:So, what would a 2014 350v63 have on it, scats or hot toasters?
Scatterwounds would be stock.
Life is suffering; the cause of suffering is desire. Envy is a deadly sin. Save your soul, go ahead and buy another one....
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4913
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by kennyhowes »

I have, on one of my guitars, a Hot Toaster (+/- 14Ω) in the bridge position, with the .0047mf cap, and a vintage toaster in the neck position (+/- 7.4Ω).

Now THAT'S a winning combination.
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by Folkie »

kennyhowes wrote:I have, on one of my guitars, a Hot Toaster (+/- 14Ω) in the bridge position, with the .0047mf cap, and a vintage toaster in the neck position (+/- 7.4Ω).

Now THAT'S a winning combination.
The best of both worlds! 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
soundmasterg
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm

Re: "Hot Toasters" vs Scatterwounds

Post by soundmasterg »

kennyhowes wrote:I have, on one of my guitars, a Hot Toaster (+/- 14Ω) in the bridge position, with the .0047mf cap, and a vintage toaster in the neck position (+/- 7.4Ω).

Now THAT'S a winning combination.
I've done that also on my 6 string 350V63 BBR. I didn't have a RIC hot toaster though, but I had a dead toaster, so I had a friend wind it hotter. It is about 12k and used 44 gauge PE wire. I think formvar wire is probably a better choice but I am going to stick with this one for awhile still. It is a little thinner and brighter than I would like out of the bridge position however. I also have a toaster wound with 43 gauge formvar as hot as I could which is about 9.5k, but I haven't tried that one yet on this guitar. I think the scatterwound toaster in the neck and a hot toaster in the bridge is definitely better than scatterwound toasters in both positions.

I think many of the 50's Capris used toasters with 43 gauge or 42 gauge wire on them and that is why they still sound great with 4k-5k on them rather than the extremely thin reissues that had 3.5k of 44 gauge wire or whatever that were put on the '58 325 reissue. I've never seen one of those older pickups myself, but have heard reports from people I know in the biz who have examined them. I plan to experiment with this further in the future as I get more dead toasters to play with.

Greg
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”