Rick porn in the wild

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
callofcthulhu
New member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:02 pm

Rick porn in the wild

Post by callofcthulhu »

AndyM
New member
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:06 pm

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by AndyM »

good stuff. to be up front but play with your head down constantly is weird to me. this band is good but that is something I expect from a beginner player.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by bassduke49 »

Welcome Tom. Is that a converted four-string to five? Thanks for posting the links to the videos!
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by edski »

Great tunes - The bass looks like it is a 5'er, with the three tuning pegs on the top of the headstock. Most 4-5 conversions put the extra peg on the bottom. I certainly could be wrong :)
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by bassduke49 »

The shape of the headstock is the same as the standard four though. I think someone did a dowel plug, redrill on the big-string side. Wonder if he will respond . . . . :?:
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by edski »

bassduke49 wrote:The shape of the headstock is the same as the standard four though. I think someone did a dowel plug, redrill on the big-string side.
Well, I will have to defer to your knowledge...after all, you wrote "The Book" :mrgreen:
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by bassduke49 »

Also, the stock 4003S/5 doesn't have binding or the shark-fin position markers. Being an S model, it has no binding and dots. I'm so used to seeing regular 4003 basses, that I hadn't even noticed that. It was the shape of the headstock and the position of the tuners that I first noticed.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
callofcthulhu
New member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:02 pm

Re: Rick porn in the wild

Post by callofcthulhu »

AndyM wrote:good stuff. to be up front but play with your head down constantly is weird to me. this band is good but that is something I expect from a beginner player.
Yeah, I'm usually in the back - that van is ridiculously small though, so my cartoonishly large pedal board got me stuck in front. I consider the Rick to be in the spotlight, rather than myself.
bassduke49 wrote:The shape of the headstock is the same as the standard four though. I think someone did a dowel plug, redrill on the big-string side. Wonder if he will respond . . . . :?:
You are correct, sir. The initial conversion was done by Paul W.

Since the initial chop-job I've had a bit more work done on it - replaced the neck PU with a Dane Wilder HB-1 push/pull split, the bridge PU with a Classic Amplification hi-gain, and the mute pad with a DiMarzio Fast Track - all of which was done by Gary Brawer's in SF.

Future possible mods may include moving the strap pins around, a brass nut, and getting a custom wound pickup for the mute cavity to replace the Fast Track (which actually paired VERY well with the original hi-gain, but not as well with the Classic Amp pup).

Cheers.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”