My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
songdog
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by songdog »

DavyR wrote:My luthier said that since the fretboard is finished (glossy?) that new frets can not be installed unless you refinish the fretboard...
Any thoughts, etc. Thanks!
I had my '72 4001 refretted by Mike Lull (Bellevue, WA).

It was some years back so I've forgotten the details... I think it involved carefully cutting the varnish with a brand new razor knife before pulling the old frets; pulling them carefully because the fretboard tends to splinter; and hand-shaping each fret before installing it. Very labor-intensive, so $$$. He did an excellent job, and I've never regretted spending the money.
Turn on, tune up, rock out!
User avatar
DavyR
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by DavyR »

Thanks for the re-fret info, all. I'm in Pittsburgh, PA. My luthier, who is well know here as being the best, says a refinish has to be done to replace the frets. So, he won't do it, otherwise. I'm getting fret buzz and he says it's because of the worn frets.

Wish I could post pics. No iPhone. Pics are on a SD camera card. I talked about this bass here years ago. I'm the second owner and bought it in 1980. It's a single piece neck, thru the body. I replaced the pickguard and added the neck pickup toaster, etc. back in 1980. It was already routed. I just replaced the harness, recently, with a push/pull. I put TIs on it. I just love to play this bass. Light weight. Thin neck. I have a 1973 4001, also, and they are two different basses.

The OTHER problem is the neck to thru the body/neck angle. Too much angle! The bridge is lowered all the way! Not much one can do about this, right? It's playable. I pick a bit harder which adds to the fret buzz. TI flats are low tension, as we know. Very little tension on the rods. They, too, were recently adjusted. I'm a bit reluctant to try higher tension strings. The 'A' of the TI set buzzes the worst, which makes sense since it has lower tension than usual relative to the other strings in this TI set.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by chefothefuture »

It sounds beyond repair and you ought to sell it to me....
Yeah, that's it....
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by Kopfjaeger »

DavyR wrote:Thanks for the re-fret info, all. I'm in Pittsburgh, PA. My luthier, who is well know here as being the best, says a refinish has to be done to replace the frets. So, he won't do it, otherwise. I'm getting fret buzz and he says it's because of the worn frets.

The OTHER problem is the neck to thru the body/neck angle. Too much angle! The bridge is lowered all the way! Not much one can do about this, right? It's playable. I pick a bit harder which adds to the fret buzz. TI flats are low tension, as we know. Very little tension on the rods. They, too, were recently adjusted. I'm a bit reluctant to try higher tension strings. The 'A' of the TI set buzzes the worst, which makes sense since it has lower tension than usual relative to the other strings in this TI set.
David, if your bridge is as low as she will go and your relief is minimal and your action is still excessive it sounds like you have a negative neck angle issue. How about a lighter gauge string? There are a few "cheats" that can be used to lower your action but they entail either plaining the bridge bottom or machining the tailpiece well deeper.

Negative neck angle is common on vintage 4001's, unfortunately.

Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
DavyR
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by DavyR »

Thanks Sepp!

Yes, negative neck angle but not excessively high action. Is negative neck angle even more common in 4000 basses with single piece necks? This 1971 4000 bass has a single piece neck with a factory route for the neck pickup. Thinner neck, and weaker IMO, as compared to the three piece neck of my 1973 4001.

I already have TI strings on it. These are already low tension.

My 'beef' is fret buzz. True flats and/or higher tension strings should improve fret buzz, but then you may add to the negative neck angle. Hence, it really needing a re-fret.

One general way to detect negative neck angle IMO is to observe the distance between the strings and the neck pickup. My strings were alway somewhat further away than most 4001 basses new or old that I have seen over the decades.
daveman
Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:18 am

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by daveman »

If you really want to address the neck angle issue, have the neck pickup route filled with a maple block. There are some threads about that. If your repair guy knows how to do it right, you can probably solve that problem.
User avatar
DavyR
Member
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by DavyR »

Thanks daveman! I'd like to keep the added neck pickup but there is still too much routing. I'll check out the threads.
daveman
Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:18 am

Re: My 1971 RIC 4000 natural color bass needs new frets!

Post by daveman »

Ah, yes. I overlooked that you'd added the neck p/u.

Somewhere there's a thread where someone filled in that route, which was larger than needed, and made a much smaller route that just barely fit the pickup, and it helped with the neck angle.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”