Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by Kiddwad57 »

superheavydeathmetal wrote: "I keep trying to dial in a certain tone."
And that's the why and wherefore for the 4003fl in a nutshell. The symphony did a pop's concert with David Brubeck and the tone Chris was getting blew me away.
User avatar
stevebasshead
Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:34 am

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by stevebasshead »

jps wrote:Have you ever tried one of these? :mrgreen:
Ooooooh so pretty!!!
User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by Kiddwad57 »

bassduke49 wrote:Consider a converted Rickenbacker 4004...There are several folks who have converted the Cheyenne or Laredo from four to five strings and find them to be very comfortable -- not too wide, not too crammed.
So now I'm curious…if it's not too much to ask, what is the string spacing at the bridge? It's a really nice looking bass. Thanks!
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by cassius987 »

Kiddwad57 wrote:
bassduke49 wrote:Consider a converted Rickenbacker 4004...There are several folks who have converted the Cheyenne or Laredo from four to five strings and find them to be very comfortable -- not too wide, not too crammed.
So now I'm curious…if it's not too much to ask, what is the string spacing at the bridge? It's a really nice looking bass. Thanks!
The 4-string spacing is 17.5 or 18 mm as I recall. A bit wider than a 4003. At least until recently, when the 4004 necks were made to match the 4003, and presumably the bridge setup is narrower to match.

I love my 2008 4004.
User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by Kiddwad57 »

Thanks Cassius, those 4004s are beautiful. Unfortunately they're not to be found in my neck 'o' the woods. I've seen a number of the 5 string conversions on these and other pages and am wondering how the string spacing of those would compare to say, my early '90s American JB5.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by cassius987 »

Kiddwad57 wrote:Thanks Cassius, those 4004s are beautiful. Unfortunately they're not to be found in my neck 'o' the woods. I've seen a number of the 5 string conversions on these and other pages and am wondering how the string spacing of those would compare to say, my early '90s American JB5.
Still a lot tighter I suspect. Since my 4003/5 has 14.5 mm spacing, I'll guess you could do no better than 16 mm on a 4004 conversion with a wide neck. I think Jazz 5ers feel so fat because they make plenty of room for 18 mm spacing or thereabouts. That said, profile of the neck is a big deal. My Dingwall was a fatty, but felt easy to play.
User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by Kiddwad57 »

That's what I would expect, thanks for the info. I'll remain happy with the status quo until the day that Rickenbacker revives the discontinued 4004/5.
User avatar
Ashgray
Intermediate Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Have I become a Rickenbacker snob?

Post by Ashgray »

...and for me, the 4003s/5 :)

Ash
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo

_____________________

Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”