What year

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
Shorne21
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 10:15 am

What year

Post by Shorne21 »

I acquired a 4001 that was beat up, I have been dabbling in guitar and bass repair and rebuild, I have always wanted a RIC. Anyway the bass that I bought the plate said it was a 1976,
but after doing some research I'm very confused, I'm thinking it is pre 76, the pearl inlays go all the way across the fret board, and it has Grover machines, the neck pick-up is close to the neck. Is there any way to nail down the year it is or could it be a 1976 left over. The picture is after I started the work.
Attachments
140713_0002.jpg
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Re: What year

Post by rictified »

I don't know of any way to ascertain the year other than with the jack plate. It's most likely earlier than 1976 though as they stopped the full length inlays sometime during the late 60's or early 70's I believe. They used wavy Grovers sporadically until the late 70's and also the 1/2" spacing was used for the neck pickup off and on until at least 75 if they had to use left over bodies. According to JH they would use whatever they had lying around the factory when they ran out of current parts so it is possible your bass was put together in 76 although I would think it would be highly unlikely.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: What year

Post by bassduke49 »

There are some oddities in your photo: It appears that a trapezoidal area at the base of the body is an addition and there's no recessed area there for the stock tailpiece/bridge assembly. Note how the dark wood strip in the center of the upper body stops at that trapezoid. Can you supply a photo of the back? Now, this could be a modified original, or maybe even a copy.

IF the full-width, crushed-pearl inlays on the fingerboard, the routing for the binding on the body for the checker and outer binding, and the shedua (dark wood) strip are all original, then that would narrow down the timeline to spring 1972 (when the shedua strip was added) to spring 1973 (when the checker binding was discontinued). More photos posted here will help us date your bass.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: What year

Post by jps »

bassduke49 wrote:IF the full-width, crushed-pearl inlays on the fingerboard, the routing for the binding on the body for the checker and outer binding, and the shedua (dark wood) strip are all original, then that would narrow down the timeline to spring 1972 (when the shedua strip was added) to spring 1973 (when the checker binding was discontinued).
+1.
The picture is after I started the work.
My guess is there was some major routing done to the body and the new wood is a repair, done by Steve, presumably.
User avatar
Badanovski
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:19 pm

Re: What year

Post by Badanovski »

That repair looks really good. What kind of bridge are you thinking?
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: What year

Post by aceonbass »

More pics please! The front and back of the body and the headstock. If this were a real Rick, it would have to be a 4001S that had the fretboard replaced with a 4001 deluxe fretboard. You'd never find a set neck with that fretboard, and this is definitely a set neck bass.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: What year

Post by bassduke49 »

aceonbass wrote:More pics please! The front and back of the body and the headstock. If this were a real Rick, it would have to be a 4001S that had the fretboard replaced with a 4001 deluxe fretboard. You'd never find a set neck with that fretboard, and this is definitely a set neck bass.
Not so sure, Dane. The shedua strip ends below the bass pickup route, not above it. Looks like a trapezoidal plug was inserted at some point. Note the differences inside the treble-pickup route. Strange.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: What year

Post by jps »

bassduke49 wrote:
aceonbass wrote:More pics please! The front and back of the body and the headstock. If this were a real Rick, it would have to be a 4001S that had the fretboard replaced with a 4001 deluxe fretboard. You'd never find a set neck with that fretboard, and this is definitely a set neck bass.
Not so sure, Dane. The shedua strip ends below the bass pickup route, not above it. Looks like a trapezoidal plug was inserted at some point. Note the differences inside the treble-pickup route. Strange.
It also has ROS on it.
Shorne21
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 10:15 am

Re: What year

Post by Shorne21 »

Here are some more pictures, I installed the maple plug, a previous owner had the Bad-*** bridge installed and it was all messed up. I have purchased a hipshot bridge to put on it but have been having second thoughts. I'm thinking of picking up a used Ric bridge but not sure (any advice), I have always wanted a Ric so this is mine to keep. Purchased some checkerboard binding from Winfield Vintage to replace the binding. I will post pictures as I go.
Attachments
DSC_0141.JPG
DSC_0140.JPG
140713_0003.jpg
140713_0001.jpg
140713_0000.jpg
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: What year

Post by bassduke49 »

OK, so shedua strip, neck through, original checker binding (now removed); most likely a '72-'73 machine.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: What year

Post by aceonbass »

Good work, but I would have made a maple block with the shedua strip in it. It's likely that the lack of one will be apparent as the finish ages. Also, why the trapazoidal shape for the filler block? I'd go stock on the restoration of this bass, since it's from one of the more collectable periods in the 70's.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”