Could a 620 12 string be played as a 6 string?

Setup, repair and restoration of Rickenbacker Instruments

Moderator: jingle_jangle

Post Reply
tim_macdougall
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 6:22 am

Could a 620 12 string be played as a 6 string?

Post by tim_macdougall »

Hi, I was wondering if a 620 12 string could be played as a six string guitar? Could the twelve string tension be maintained by using six heavy gauge strings? Is the neck tension something to worry about? I am asking because I was wondering if I could buy a 12 string instead of having to get both a twelve and a six string guitar? What do you think?
markthemd
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2000 8:59 pm

Post by markthemd »

I know plenty of players that do this .

You will need to adjust the truss rods to 'jump' back and forth for this .

You will NOT hurt the instrument at all.
So you too want yours "ALAPWOB"?!?!
grsnovi
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 320
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2001 5:06 pm

Post by grsnovi »

In fact, Rickenbacker used to make a 12 string which had a "comb" device that could be engaged to pull down the octave strings so that you could go back and forth while it was strung as a twelve string (I actually played one once.. ;-)
User avatar
bails
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 2:05 am

Post by bails »

I have an '80 330/12, strung as a six string, but there are two few minor points to note. Firstly, you may need to detach the plastic nut, so that it can be slid up or down slightly to compensate for the twelve string slots being slightly higher and lower than the center of the string position. This is unnoticable at the bridge end, so no need to replace the bridge! Secondly, I don't know what current Rick 12 necks are like, but my 1980 is very fat. It's okay when you get used to it, but it is a hell of a lot more chunky than a six string neck, and a little harder to play.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights do make a left.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15126
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Right you are Gary. It was the Model 366/12
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
axel

Post by axel »

Does that mean that all Ric 12 have fatter necks, due to more tension to deal with ?
tell me they don't..
axel
User avatar
ted_williams
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2001 12:58 pm

Post by ted_williams »

I had a 360/12 with a very thin neck. I think it's all a matter of who's shaping the necks that day.
User avatar
carr
Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2001 2:17 pm

Post by carr »

My 360/12 appeard to have a thinner neck than my 370.......work that out.... I eventually put the vernier on them and at the nut they were the same. I lowered the strings which improved the 370 but it still feels thicker. Maybe its the shape at the edges of the neck thats thicker. Ill check that
markthemd
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2000 8:59 pm

Post by markthemd »

To my knowledge ..size of neck for strength has NEVER been a factor at Rickenbacker ,the old 360-12 strings that were made from day one to the Carl wilson signatures all have that skinny neck .

If you found a fat one ....you are lucky!
So you too want yours "ALAPWOB"?!?!
Post Reply

Return to “"Vibrola" Rickenbacker Technical Forum: By Paul Wilczynski”