Headstock change on 4001v63?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

ataritoobin
Junior Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:19 am

Headstock change on 4001v63?

Post by ataritoobin »

What year did Rickenbacker change to the shorter style headstock on the 4001v63?

Thanks for any help!

-Steve
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I thought they started out shorter and then eventually all of the Rics sported the current headstock ... the 4004 and v63 basses had it first ... then the 4003 got it about 1997 ...
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by bottom4 »

here's my March 85
Image
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

Uhm, forgive me - but the 4001v63 was/is entirely immune to headstock changes, no?

It's a replica of a circa-63 4001S, it is what it is, I.e - large with walnut headwings.
lshaia
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:15 am

Post by lshaia »

Here's a poor quality shot of my '99:
Image
They did change at some point, when we discussed this earlier we measured 'em, mine is a half inch shorter than some of the older ones.
johnashfield
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:57 pm
Contact:

Post by johnashfield »

When the 4003 went back to the larger headstock it was still smaller than the v63. Around this point it appears they standardized the 4003 and v63 headstock shape.

The headstock of my 2004 4003 is the same as all the v63's I saw in the late 90's early 2000's.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Here's a shot of my 92 headstock, as you can see it's longer, slightly wiider than the 99, and closer to the 85.

Image
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Here's my May '93.
Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

This is my 97 4003's headstock which is very close to the 92 v63's.

Of coures using the TRC as the reference, it may be that there have been slight changes to it, that then appear as changes to the headstock

Image
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ken_j »

Here's my 91' V63.
Image
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

My '03 4004Cii is more like the vintage '60s headstock than the current 4003 or late '90s and later V63 headstock, which look the same. In fact the 4004Cii is identical in shape and size to my '67 4005WB.

4004Cii

Image

'67 4005WB

Image
User avatar
actual_size
New member
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 3:30 pm

Post by actual_size »

A 1988 v63
Image
User avatar
lowendbob
Advanced Member
Posts: 1639
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:25 am

Post by lowendbob »

How long was the run on the v63?
Buy it before someone else does.
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

Jps, lets see a full body shot of your Natural Cii.

And isn't that a headstock of a 4003 MG/Laredo MG?
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by bottom4 »

Here's mine – I’m a much better bass player than I am photographer!

This is my favorite bass to play.

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”