3001 vs 4003s

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
TownesVanZandt
New member
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 7:26 pm

3001 vs 4003s

Post by TownesVanZandt »

Both a 3001 ($1200) and a 4003s ($1400) have come available for sale in my area as of late at reasonable prices, the 3001 probably being much more reasonable than the 4003s. I used to own a 4003s and liked it quite alot. How does it play compared to the 3001? Thoughts on the 3001 in general? I have read they are heavy and not great to use for a full night's show.

TIA!
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 3001 vs 4003s

Post by lumgimfong »

If this is in MD and you dont buy the 3001 please let me know.

I have read mixed reviews but I only buy shortscales from now on and I’d love a shortscale Ric.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 3001 vs 4003s

Post by jps »

lumgimfong wrote:If this is in MD and you dont buy the 3001 please let me know.

I have read mixed reviews but I only buy shortscales from now on and I’d love a shortscale Ric.
3001 is long scale.
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 3001 vs 4003s

Post by lumgimfong »

Oops.. yes i see the 3000 is the shortie. Never mind.
User avatar
Isaac
Member
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:24 am

Re: 3001 vs 4003s

Post by Isaac »

I have a 3001. It is quite heavy. The neck is thick, which is not to my taste. Mine plays nicely, though, and it has a sound unlike any other Ric I've ever played. The tone controls are also different, with boost and cut for both bass and treble. I suggest that you give it a try, if you can, but, for myself, I'd go with the 4003S.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”