NAMM 2005 pictures

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13212
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

I found two pics of that same 4004/5Cii from the link Dave 4004 posted, it's really nice!!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

My error guys, John, Dan thanks for pointing it out to me.

If you are looking for suggestions on how to make it easier, take out the samples of the translucent colours and leave the wording. In my case I've always looked at the translucecnt samples, skimmed the wording and wrongly asumed that these were the "only" colours for the 4004.

Alternatley make "Available in standard Rickenbacker colours" bold so your eyes are drawn to that portion of the text

Having said that, the pic of the Fireglo is the first time I've seen a standard type finish on a 4004.

Thanks again for clearing this up.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

yep the 4004 looks good in fireglo ...

Image
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Aw, Jeff, you got my GAS going again. Yum.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Here's the cropped view of the Fireglo body:

Image

Sorry I didn't take more hi-res close-ups, but I was running late (this was after 3 p.m. on Sunday, the last day!).

Paul, the Olympus D-400Z doesn't render red well no matter what the lighting source and the exposure setting are. I did use some exposure compensation in some of my NAMM pics, but I couldn't tell you exactly what I used on a particular picture, as I was trying this and that. I should have been reviewing the pictures when I took them, but didn't.

The D-400Z is pretty good for outdoor pictures, like this one I took up on Mt. Lassen a few years ago:

Image
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
roadrunners
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:15 pm
Contact:

Post by roadrunners »

where is the namm show?
"This is my personal quote"
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

The NAMM show in question was held last week at the Anaheim Convention Center. It is an industry-only event, not open to the general public.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

Gary,
The Mt. Lassen pic is very nice! The The D-400Z does make excellent outdoor images. Now I understand your frustration. Well...at least our Ricks don't fail us like cameras sometimes do.Image
aristeas
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 260
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 2:46 am
Contact:

Post by aristeas »

Hi Garry, There's a program you can download for free that will let you brighten your pictures up so they look as good as they do in natural daylight. It's called Irfanview:

http://www.irfanview.com/

When you've opened an image file you go to 'Image/Enhance Colors/Gamma Correction' and adjust to get a perfect pic.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Won't work with MAC, unfortunately...
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Thanks for the info, Lee. The Olympus came with Camedia software (not Y2K compliant!) that has gamma correction, but it seems to be "clunky" to use, not easy to make changes that are indeed corrections, rather than just adventures into art nouveau!
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

I downloaded IRFANVIEW and used it to recover a pic of Jaymi and I taken when we met in Ontario. Previously this picture was so dark all you could make out was a little of the Chrome

Image

So left to right
My 97-Fireglo 4003 Ted's Restored 4004 Cheyenne My 92-Fireglo 4001-v63
Not a high quality image, but recovered from black is pretty good. Thanks for the suggestion.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
oreca
Intermediate Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:48 pm

Post by oreca »

Picking up from where you left off...

Image

It's still a bit too dark but that's because of the compression from making it "web friendly".

If you are really interested, you can e-mail it to me and I can redo it with Photoshop CS and send it back to you with no quality loss Image

Free of charge of course!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

How's this, taken from the first image posted?

Image
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

One of my favorite features of CS is the "save for web" one. And the program only costs a grand...
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”