Finally unveiled

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

SWEET MOMMA!! Congrats Henny!

I'm sure it was worth the wait and the pain of letting the '72 go.....
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

Hehe, sure bloomin' was. Image

Action and feel is spot on. She reminds me of a 4003S I used for a while. I can't get used to the unbound fingerboard, though. Looks so chunky! Image

Compared to the old 72 and my 4003s back at home, she's a piano. Sustain is mind-blowing.
loendmaestro
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:53 pm
Contact:

Post by loendmaestro »

I'm jonesin' for a Laredo. How different would you say the hi-gains vs. the modern Rick humbuckers are?
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

One word: Added Thunder. Image

Initially I was dubious about not being able to replicate the 4001 sound entirely, so I needed a Ric bass that I could slap, make big rock/blues tones with and keep that 4001 clank/twang, rolled into one.

It does the lot, effortlessly; especially aided with a decent preamp and some effects.

If I could discribe it in one sentence, it's like an EB-3 crossed with a 4001. It has the best of both worlds, tonally.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Congrats Henny, she's a real looker. I have a couple questions for anybody in the know:

1) The neck on my '93 Cheyenne is wider across the 12th fret and bridge than any of my other Ricks. From the RIC website measurements, it looks like the CheyenneII might be narrower and more like the 4003. Does anybody have both a Cheyenne and a Cheyenne II to confirm?

2) The Laredo is offered in any of the Rick colors. So what is the difference between it and the CheyenneII? Is it just the chrome hardware vs. gold? So...would a Laredo in trans red look exactly like a CheyenneII in trans red but have chrome hardware? Same figured wood?
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

Hey Jeff, cheers bud!

Not too certain about the measurements, but...

The Laredo is made of solid Maple, just like the 4003S, with a the smoother 4004 body shape of course.

The CII body is made of a Maple/Walnut sandwich, which determines why they're generally regarded to be a lot more heavy/boomy, thunderous than the Laredo - which is brighter and twangy.

As far as I know, the three Special colours, (tranny red/blue/green) are only available on the CII, but I *think* they apply to the Laredo now, too.

"Would a Laredo in trans red look exactly like a CheyenneII in trans red but have chrome hardware? Same figured wood?" -

From the Laredos I've seen, the maple would definitely have less flame/figure to it. Laredo's don't feature Walnut headwings, either.

But, without a doubt - my next bass is a Laredo... in Blueburst!
scottpro1969
Intermediate Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:19 am

Post by scottpro1969 »

Stunning!!!!
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Thanks, Henny!
Play what you love, love what you play!
highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

I own both Cheyenne versions and the Ci is wider across the fingerboard than the Cii. Both Cheyenne necks have a slightly thinner profile than my 4003. Actually, my Cii seems like the most comfortable of the group to play. It's also slightly brighter than the Ci.

That' s nice-looking bass, Henny! I just received mine in tranny blue through an Ebay purchase. I think the thread is still around.
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

lOVE THAT TRANNY RED!!!
Buy it before someone else does
marty
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 6:00 am

Post by marty »

Gorgeous bass Henny!

Where did you pick the beauty up...in the UK?

4004CII's are pretty rare on these shores aren't they....I've never seen one let alone had the pleasure of playing one.

Love the colour too...awesome!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Wow!!! Enjoy that sweet bass!
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by bottom4 »

Cheers Mark!

Glad to see she got to you in one piece and happy to hear you love the set-up! These babies rock, don’t they!

Hey Mark, let me know when you find that little USA flag. Hint, you don’t need to take anything apart!

Now there’s a little piece of me in the UK – I love it! Image

Enjoy and congrats Mark!
User avatar
vito
Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 4:17 pm

Post by vito »

>2) The Laredo is offered in any of the Rick colors. >So what is the difference between it and the >CheyenneII? Is it just the chrome hardware vs. >gold? So...would a Laredo in trans red look exactly >like a CheyenneII in trans red but have chrome >hardware? Same figured wood?

Hey Jeff T,
I just looked into this not long ago. The Laredo is only available in standard colors, none of the translucent colors are available. My suspicion [not confirmed] is that RIC uses nicer maple to make the Cheyenne in the translucent finsh. Others have commented that there is a slight difference in sound between the Cii and the L. I have a 4004Cii in tranny green that kicks butt, but I am in the process of purchasing chrome hardware to change over to a shy-RAY-doe.
"Where there is beer, there is hope."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”