Change of sound after removing pick up cover

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rich
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 8:11 pm

Change of sound after removing pick up cover

Post by rich »

Does removing the pick up cover from a 4001C64 alter the performance or sound of that pick up in any way?
Thanks, Rich
If you really want it, do what you need to...Get it done!
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

I removed mine from both my 40001V63 and my 4001C64S and noticed no difference.
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Maybe it allows you to play directly over the PU, which will alter the tone some...

The reason I took it off (and subsequently lost it) was my teacher said "you get the best sound playing directly over the PU"...
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

My test is not very scientific but... The VRI shoes don't seem to extend the field from the alnico poles. If there is a field around them, it is too weak to pick up paperclips and is probably inadvertant and does not affect the sound. Given that, removing the shoes should not change anything except maybe your playing comfort.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Jeff, do you still have the shoes ??
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I believe JH said the shoes on the v63 did effect the sound ...
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

I don't really see the point of paying all the money for a v63 or c64 then ripping out the shoes ... !
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Jeff said:
(I believe JH said the shoes on the v63 did effect the sound ...)

Then maybe the shoes passively alter the magnetic field. If that is the case, the affect of the shoes is probably very subtle.
jocke

Post by jocke »

IMO the removal of the shoes on my v63 resulted in a somewhat weaker/thinner sound that was audiable when I played my bass through HiFi headphones but not so much through the amp.
I dont own this bass anymore but have an other one coming next week Image
I´ll try it again then.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

hey I'll buy them shoes!
Buy it before someone else does
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

Well, I removed the shoes on my 4001CS when I first got it a few years ago. I just got my 4001C64S and thought I'd try to play with the shoes left on. I tried both basses last night for sound check, and the C64S didn't sound as good (that's WITH the magnets). I'm sure a lot of variables are at work, but the most obvious one is that with the CS4001 I noticed I play right over the treble pickup almost all the time. Playing behind the pickup on the C64S resulted in a thinner almost 'boxy' sound. I thought the sounds would be closer as both have a toaster/horseshoe combination but not so. In addition, the rotosound strings I use on the 4001CS are a heavier gauge. The sound of the 4001CS was obviously fuller to musicians and drummers alike Image. I know John Hall once posted something to the effect of 'it changes the magnetic field' (I'll obviously acquiese to his superior understanding on this point), but I'll be pulling the shoes and putting on rotosounds awfully quick so I can use the C64S for the next gig.
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

yeah you better throw them thangs away-better yet, I'll take off your hand for free!
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Hey there ... get in line, I've a brand new Sergio pickup coming that needs shoes !!!!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
dean712
Intermediate Member
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:56 pm

Post by dean712 »

Forgive me if I'm raising a question y'all have discussed many times before, but I have spent some time searching the Forum here and this is the closest I've come to the subject... Is there a good discussion thread somewhere of the plusses/minuses and hows/wherefores of keeping or removing that rear bass pickup cover?

Personally, I learned to play on my first real bass - a '94 JG 4003; I play fingerstyle and learned to anchor my thumb on the pickguard and pluck right in front of the pickup cover. Nowadays, it's second nature, and I wouldn't consider removing the pickup covers - it's just the way I play, and the pickup cover is actually a reference point for my right pinky. I left the pickup covers on because of the way I learned and because frankly they look pretty badass (the stagelights off the extra chrome is nice!). However, I realize that there are probably 1000 different ways to play bass, and a lot of it is personal preference. And... there is the sound issue....

Many of the bassists I've seen playing (those playing RICs) have removed the pickup covers.

I guess I have 2 questions: 1)What percentage of bassists leave the pickup cover on, like me, and 2)Is there a good thread somewhere in the archives of the hows/whys of pickup removal, or should we start one? (or is this it?)
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

Welcome to the forum Dean. I have always taken my cover off, because my thumb sits on the pick up. I play finger style & I have always liked the sound you get by playing directly over the p/up....not too hard & not too soft.
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”