Change of sound after removing pick up cover

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

OK, a minor nightmare... Love the 4001C64S, but right now it sounds terrible! I removed the horseshoe magnets and now have virtually NO signal from the treble pickup. It didn't seem that powerful to begin with. Could I have a dud pickup? The 4001CS kicks a$$ without the shoes; I put rotosounds on the C64S and did exactly the same thing to the new Rick and almost nothing for signal. Anyone have some ideas?
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

Removing the shoes on a horseshoe is like beheading it!

A hi-gain is just as effective as a shoeless horseshoe, why not simply apply a reversable mod and install a hi-gain...?
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Chuck-

My C64S sounds great w/o 'shoes. Like I said before, I couldn't tell the difference in sound with or without shoes on both my v63 and my c64. But I sure could tell the difference in playability! The C64 Horseshoe is not as hi output as the v63 or CS horseshoe and obviously comparing the two will show that. Could it your problem have something to do with the ground wire that was attached to the 'shoes? I forget how I did it, but I made sure it was still hooked up. Also, are you sure the pickup height is the same now as it was before the 'shoe-ectomy?

Henny-

I like the high gains, but why would I want to buy a new pickup, solder it in, and thus alter the sound of a unique and kinda rare Rick? Removing the 'shoes is a less involved, more easily reversable, cheaper, and lower hassle alternative.

So...Bleah!
Play what you love, love what you play!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yeah it shouldn't sound THAT much different, I would check the pickup height also. They don't have to be the same height either, I usually put the bridge PU closer to the strings than the neck for more bite.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

check polarity of the p'up?

Sergio!
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

OK Jeff, point taken.. ImageImage
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yes, opposite polarity would make it less and less full to the point of being very nasel as you equaled both volumes instead of the other way around. Start with both volumes on full and back off the neck volume knob on your bass, if the sound gets a lot fuller instead of thinner your polarity is backwards. Then try the opposite, treble knob turned down.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Chuck:
Sounds like someone installed an original '60s horseshoe pickup on your 4001C64S somewhere along the line! A re-issue horseshoe pickup, as found on the CS, will not be thusly adversely affected if the 'shoes are removed. Unless... Can you measure the ohm rating on the treble pickup on your 4001C64S?
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

So how would you reverse the polarity then?
Play what you love, love what you play!
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

Thanks for all the help. I will check out all these things. Now I realize that it is the pickup or wiring because when I played it with the shoes on it sounded wimpy: I just assumed that it was where I played behind the pickup and the lighter gauge of strings. There's no way a pickup is that weak. Again, I did remove the shoes on my 4001CS and it's a monster (often get compliments on how great it sounds). I'll be checking all these things and I'm sure I can get it. If not I'll have to send it back, which I DO NOT want to do- I want to play this bass, it's just too damn sweet to be without for several weeksImage
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Jeff, reverse the wires to reverse the polarity.
Sérgio I thought of that too but figured it would be so remote that it would be almost impossible.
saxon
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:00 am

Post by saxon »

So to remove the pickup cover on a 4003 it seems that the whole chromed plate assy needs to be removed, which means string removal too. Is this right?
Always wanted to be in a band. Got recruited as a begining bass player a year ago and just bought my second bass. A 1983 white 4003. Lovin' it all.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

So the polarity couldn't have changed when the 'shoes were removed unless the soldered contacts were broken and then re-connected.

Saxon-that's how I've always done it. I've heard somone here say that you can bend the plastic cover and pull it out after removing the screws, but I wouldn't do it that way.
Play what you love, love what you play!
saxon
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:00 am

Post by saxon »

THANKS JEFF
Always wanted to be in a band. Got recruited as a begining bass player a year ago and just bought my second bass. A 1983 white 4003. Lovin' it all.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yes you can bend it a little, that hint was courtesy of JH, it works I've done it ever since.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”