Need a Small Amp for my 330 12

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Post by longhouse »

Orange Amps are great. I like their crunch and bite more than any Marshall -BUT- they are one trick ponies. They could be your sonic Nirvana if you like their sound; otherwise you should find something with more versatility.
Shaking the floor of Heaven
User avatar
firstbassman
Advanced Member
Posts: 1573
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:00 am

Post by firstbassman »

My only experience with Tech 21 was with the Spider II 30. It was pretty good. Comes with four pre-sets. Decent price for the wattage. It did have the annoying habit though of always turning on with the Echo effect on.
I agree with Gerry, the Fender 25R is excellent. Great value.
[PS: I wish I could get to design an amp with a simple and logical user interface.]
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

I thought the Spider II 30 was a Line 6 product. I've got one on my office, and it doesn't say "Tech 21" anywhere on it...
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
firstbassman
Advanced Member
Posts: 1573
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:00 am

Post by firstbassman »

You mean Paul you never heard of the special edition very rare Tech 21 Spider? It's three and a half times better than the Line 6! (Get it?)
Sorry. Hey, Tech 21, Line 6, they both have numbers, right? We all make mistakes. ("...got one ON my office...")
I have a SansAmp for my bass. That's from Tech 21, correct?
Must have had that on the brain.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Mark, it was a typo. And I was genuinely wondering myself if Tech 21 might've made a Spider, so no sarcasm was intended.

We all do make mistakes...
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
wmthor
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:14 am

Post by wmthor »

I have a Fender 25R, a Vox Pathfinder and a Traynor YCV20WR. The Fender has been in the back of the closet ever since I got the Pathfinder. Of course, the Traynor is the amp that I use about 90% of the time.
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Post by longhouse »

I love my Traynor...
Shaking the floor of Heaven
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Pick up a '60s or early '70s Fender Princeton Reverb, great chimey sounding all tube amp.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

>>Pick up a '60s or early '70s Fender Princeton Reverb, great chimey sounding all tube amp.<<

Fantastic advice. I played several guitars for years, in clubs and recordings, including Ric 6 and 12s and the Princeton was great (I didn't even have a reverb.) Ideal for rehearsals and clubs. Loud but not obnoxious to the point of having band members or sound techs want to kill you. And of course easy to carry around. Now I have two Princeton Reverbs, a 65 and 66.
This is off the record
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The Princeton Reverbs sound even better than the Princetons as they have an extra gain stage before the phase inverter from the second half of the 12AX7 used in the reverb recovery section.
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Huh? If I knew what you just said, Jeff...... Can I have it in technical terms next time, please? Image
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Image

Ask Charlie the Tube Tech to explain it to you! Image

Or I'll show you when you get to Cleveburg.
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

I think Chrlie might have opted out - we haven't heard from him in ages!

I don't think I need to know too much about phase inversion, reverb recovery and them 'rectumfier' thingies - think I'll leave that to you guys.....
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
steve_hershberger
Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:37 pm
Contact:

Post by steve_hershberger »

Howard - Jeff is just saying that Princeton Reverbs sound better than the Princeton (non-reverb) amps. ;-)

Seriously, it's because of the extra circuitry used in the reverb models. Anyway, in general, the non-reverb models usually sound cleaner farther up the volume dial as compared to the Princeton Reverbs - so, you might start getting a real nice "just breaking up" tone on a PR in the 5-7 range on its volume knob; and the regular Princeton might stay clean all the way up to 10.

Sorry, it's early in the morning, hope this makes sense.
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

"the phase inverter from the second half of the 12AX7 used in the reverb recovery section"

Is that the bit next to the defribulator Jeff?
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”