Set neck versus through neck

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
pflash4001
Member
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by pflash4001 »

Pardon my ignorance, but what's the difference between a 4001 and a 4001s?
Never ask "how much worse could it possibly get?"
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

Javier, the 4001 (and its replacement, the 4003) is the deluxe model with binding on the body and neck and "shark fin" or triangular position markers on the fretboard. The 4001S (and its replacements, the 4003S and the Vintage models 4001V63 and 4001C64) have no binding and simple dots for position markers. Below are examples of both; an '07 Amber Fireglo 4003 and a '97 Fireglo 4001V63.

Image Image
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
pflash4001
Member
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by pflash4001 »

Thanks for the info!
Never ask "how much worse could it possibly get?"
relayer4u
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:54 pm

Post by relayer4u »

Javier

You will also find "S" style basses that are labeled as a RM(Rose Morris) or RM 1999 (Rose Morris model 1999), and the 4001CS (Chris Squire signature model).

Just like this one:



Image
relayer4u
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:54 pm

Post by relayer4u »

Isn't that extra dot like having two belly buttons?

;^)
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

Yeah, it is odd, isn't it? For those wondering, the typical V63 shouldn't have a position-marker dot on the 19th fret. Don't know why, but mine does. Standard S models have it, so it was probably a fretboard made for an S and grabbed on the line by mistake. No biggie.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
relayer4u
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:54 pm

Post by relayer4u »

Here is 867 a bit less fuzzy:

Image
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Post by woodyng »

a bit late chiming in-i have a 74 4000 set-neck that i love. it has been strung with pyramids for 3 years,but i recently changed to dr sunbeams for a different sound. it sounds really good with both string types,I'm thinking of trying some rotosound tapes on it,but am not sure if the tuners will accomodate the large e string. mine has the huge open-back reverse tuning keys with the teeny posts....
'74 4000 White
'98 4004Ci
'04 4004Cii MG Fretless conversion
'04 4004 Laredo FG 4002v57 Custom
just_bassics
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:12 am

Post by just_bassics »

Okay, while we're on that subject, does anyone know if an '82 4001S would be okay with Rotosounds? I'd like to set it up that way but unsure if the neck and fretboard would suffer, I've been using DR Highbeams with good results.

Anyone?
You can never own too many guitars!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”