Larger Headstock

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by BobKat »

Nice rant.
Rick325man
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:52 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by Rick325man »

I too prefer the smaller headstock design and thankfully RIC has returned to its roots in that regards. I do have an 87 330FG which has the larger headstock. I have had it so long that it doesn't bother me now, although it did initially back in '87 ... it has fantastic playability and the tone is great.
User avatar
wmthor
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:14 am

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by wmthor »

jingle_jangle wrote:It's fairly simple (I know, I know, everything's relative!) to narrow the headstock, and I've done it to more than a few Ricks. Less than an hour's work with a spindle sander. But then the real work begins--the refinishing necessary to make it look like it started narrow. If the Rick is MG or JG, it's fairly straightforward. ...
I'm late to this thread, but if I understand PW correctly, it's very feasible to narrow the headstock. If that's true, my 360 LH MG may be such a candidate; maybe even a complete refinish.
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
User avatar
SnappyFerret
New member
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by SnappyFerret »

Here's another minority opinion: I am happy with the wider headstock. Of course I like greasy spoon cooking and Champale ("only pennies more than beer"). :)
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by deaconblues »

I like the big headstock...but only on my 330. :mrgreen:
untitled657.JPG
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by admin »

I prefer the narrower headstock. I also wonder whether the reduction in mass that accompanies the downsizing produces a change in tone.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by jps »

admin wrote:I prefer the narrower headstock.
+1 :D
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by JakeK »

Would the vintage reissues have smaller headstocks?
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by tennis_nick »

I consider it a detail of little importance to myself when it comes to Rick's, but I can see how others would feel otherwise. As long as it has that general Rick shape, I don't think It'd bother me at all.
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by beatlefreak »

the DCMs came out in both wide and narrow headstocks.
Ka is a wheel.
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by whojamfan »

In 10 years I can put my big headstock on Ebay and sell it for big bucks with its "rare, limited edition wide headstock" :lol: In 15 I could say "vintage" :lol: :lol:
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by electrofaro »

Maybe a weird question... can someone post a picture with large and narrow headstock side by side? I never knew there were different kinds... and am wondering what kind my 360 has (that about shows how many Rickenbackers I've see in Holland - one, tbh).

Reading these forums for 5 minutes per day teaches me more about Rickenbackers than I ever thought possible :D



W...
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by whojamfan »

Wildberry wrote:Reading these forums for 5 minutes per day teaches me more about Rickenbackers than I ever thought possible :D
Carefull sir, 5 turns in to 10 turns in to 20, just like rabbitts. It's ok, you're amongst friends here, and as soon as we get our international Rickenbacker Anonymous charter, we will be able to provide a free cup of coffee everytime we log on :lol:

Glad to have you here, I've learned a ton of information here, and usually learn something new everytime I log on. At the very least, it's always entertaining.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by jimk »

OK...coffee and Ricks...two of my favorite subjects. :mrgreen:

JimK
User avatar
Ontario_RIC_fan
Advanced Member
Posts: 2797
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:39 pm

Re: Larger Headstock

Post by Ontario_RIC_fan »

Wildberry wrote:Maybe a weird question... can someone post a picture with large and narrow headstock side by side? I never knew there were different kinds...
W...
There's my 77 320 next to my 91 610...
small fam 0010.jpg
Small 0008.jpg
Brian Morton
A Rickenbacker Fan
in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
=========================
67 FG 625
74 JG 4000
76 JG 430
77 JG 620
77 JG 320
79 MG 450
79 JG 4001
80 FG 620/12
81 BG 480
91 JG 610
02 BG 620
78 TR7
83 TR25
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”