Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

libratune wrote:If you are going to be logging some serious playing time with your Rick 12, I would go for the 360-12, in whatever version -- reissue V64 or C63 or newer with hi-gains. It is light and fits under your elbow pretty well for hours of playing while standing.

I like the double bound models. As one who owns and gigs with both the 6 sgtring WBs and 381s, I can vouch for the above info. The 381 is not really that much heavier, but the extra bulk sometimes feels as though it's in the way.

libratune wrote:The 381/12V69, as noted, is more bulky and heavy. The neck width is the same on both models.

For me it's the bulk. The weight doesn't bother me at all.

libratune wrote:The real issue for me with the 381/12V69, however, is that it is such a work of craftmanship and art, you likely will not want to drag it around for gigs.

Oops. I gig with mine at every show, , though I'll switch off with my Gretsch Silverjet.

libratune wrote:So if you are looking for something that looks super (hold out for flame!) that you will play for your own enjoyment, holding out for the 381 is not a bad idea. If you are doing gigs, I'd go for a 360. My issue with the 330 is that, without the edge binding on the body, it tends to accumulate edge dents and wear. My ear is not good enough to distinguish the tonal difference between a 330/12 and a 360/12. But any way you go, you'll get that Fabulous Rick 12 Sound!

Sound advice on all accounts IMHO

libratune wrote:My issue with the 330 is that, without the edge binding on the body, it tends to accumulate edge dents and wear.

Yeah, exactly. It's one of the reasons I was perplexed that the WB models were dropped-binding may be more expensive, but it's inherently practical for a guitar, in addition to the stunning beauty it adds!