So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

placebo62
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 am

So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by placebo62 »

Hey guys,

So I've been looking for a 12 string Ric for a little while, and I had been tossing up between a 360/12v64 or a 360/12c63. Then I started looking more into the 381/12v69 and hot damn. GAS!

The cheapest I can find it for is $3250 - in fireglo, which is what I want. Just dont want the new price tag.

So what are my chances of finding a used 381/12v69 in fireglo for around $2500? - which is what I was expecting to pay for a 360/12v64 or a 360/12c63.

Image

:shock:
squid
Member
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:54 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by squid »

They appeared pretty regularly a few years ago, but you're right -- ever since the price increase, used 381's (twelves in particular) have been pretty thin on the ground. I guess the reasoning is that if you sell it, you'll never be able to afford a new one. I would hold out for one in the $2800 range, but you'll have to be patient. They are definitely worth the wait.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by chefothefuture »

The difference between 3250 and 2800 is so nominal; why wait?
If you like what you find, make a reasonable offer; you'll never know what
a person will say...
They do turn up from time to time, but since the list is now over
5K , most dealers are going to price used ones accordingly....
True, they aren't as rare as some, but being at the top of the line,
they aren't in abundant numbers either.....
User avatar
fatcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1198
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by fatcat »

As well, they are hard to find new.
placebo62
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by placebo62 »

chefothefuture wrote:The difference between 3250 and 2800 is so nominal; why wait?
If you like what you find, make a reasonable offer; you'll never know what
a person will say...
They do turn up from time to time, but since the list is now over
5K , most dealers are going to price used ones accordingly....
True, they aren't as rare as some, but being at the top of the line,
they aren't in abundant numbers either.....
True the leap from 3250 to 2800 is not much, but I had been looking at 2500 as my upper limit on a 360/12v64 or c63.

At then end of the day, other than cosmetics, are these guitars going to sounds much 'better' than a 330/12 with toasters? - which is at least 1k cheaper.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by tennis_nick »

I haven't checked my math, but I believe they are 51 better than a 330.
placebo62
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by placebo62 »

51 eh?

:mrgreen:

come on, I know 'better' is subjective, would like to hear opinions from folks that have tried both though.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by jingle_jangle »

The difference is perceptible--mostly in the feel of the instrument. My V69 was the second of my new Ricks; it still gets trotted out only for special occasions...its feel is one of vintage style and solidity It is a heavier guitar than my 330, and it could be my mind playing tricks, but it sounds less woody than the 330. I've never done the math; could be that the 330 has more air inside; the V69 is definitely thicker around the edges, and with a smaller diaphragmatic area front and back, you'll get less hollowbody "vibe".

The 330 is a light Fall suit. The V69 is a full-tilt cutaway with tails. It's a class thing. The 330 has a name like "Smith". The V69 is more...hyphenated.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by sloop_john_b »

jingle_jangle wrote:The difference is perceptible--mostly in the feel of the instrument. My V69 was the second of my new Ricks; it still gets trotted out only for special occasions...its feel is one of vintage style and solidity It is a heavier guitar than my 330, and it could be my mind playing tricks, but it sounds less woody than the 330. I've never done the math; could be that the 330 has more air inside; the V69 is definitely thicker around the edges, and with a smaller diaphragmatic area front and back, you'll get less hollowbody "vibe".
Mine was a very early one (L0 XXXX - 12/87) and the top and sides were very thick. It was a very body-heavy instrument, but I don't think I'd call it unbalanced. Extremely "solid" feeling. I remember reading that the v69's have changed over time, but I'm not sure how exactly - maybe they're less bulky now?

Tone-wise, I always felt it sounded a bit "stiff" - glib, I know, but that's the best way I can describe it! I prefer a 330/360, tonally. There is certainly some difference there.
The 330 is a light Fall suit. The V69 is a full-tilt cutaway with tails. It's a class thing. The 330 has a name like "Smith". The V69 is more...hyphenated.
Well said! :D
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by libratune »

If you are going to be logging some serious playing time with your Rick 12, I would go for the 360-12, in whatever version -- reissue V64 or C63 or newer with hi-gains. It is light and fits under your elbow pretty well for hours of playing while standing.

The 381/12V69, as noted, is more bulky and heavy. The neck width is the same on both models.

The real issue for me with the 381/12V69, however, is that it is such a work of craftmanship and art, you likely will not want to drag it around for gigs. So if you are looking for something that looks super (hold out for flame!) that you will play for your own enjoyment, holding out for the 381 is not a bad idea. If you are doing gigs, I'd go for a 360. My issue with the 330 is that, without the edge binding on the body, it tends to accumulate edge dents and wear. My ear is not good enough to distinguish the tonal difference between a 330/12 and a 360/12. But any way you go, you'll get that Fabulous Rick 12 Sound!

PS: Despite what I said about playing out with a 381, a gentleman with the handle of bobfoleywines has a thread on the "Ricks for Sale" topic on this forum where he sought help in locating a replacement for his damaged 381V69 6 string that he gigs with. You could contact him and get his take on why he prefers a 381. Plus that thread provides some info on where 381s may be available.

PPS: Here's one just up on ebay, beautiful flame maple, min bid $2800:
http://cgi.ebay.com/99-Rickenbacker-381 ... dZViewItem

Good luck and happy hunting.
2ricks
Junior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:59 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by 2ricks »

I haven't seen any on ebay in a long time. It used to be the Rickenbacker guitar I saw most frequently up for auction
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by libratune »

libratune wrote:
PPS: Here's one just up on ebay, beautiful flame maple, min bid $2800:
http://cgi.ebay.com/99-Rickenbacker-381 ... dZViewItem
Update: This one didn't last long, went for $3200 BIN.
placebo62
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by placebo62 »

Thanks guys.

yeah, I'm leaning towards a v64 or c63 again now I think. Just to save a few $$. Eventhough I wontn be gigging with the 381 - I dont think I can justify over 3k on a fiddle. hehe

If anyone spots a v64 or c63 in fireglo let me know!\

:mrgreen: :mrgreen:
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by 1965 »

Jump on this one, looks pretty nice. Auction ends tomorrow.

http://cgi.ebay.com/RICKENBACKER-360-12 ... dZViewItem

Image
placebo62
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:00 am

Re: So is the 381/12v69 pretty much impossible to find used?

Post by placebo62 »

Hey Wes, thanks for that man. Yeah I spotted that one on ebay too. They wont ship overseas though. (I'm in Austalia.)

Not to worry, I need to sell by 360/6 before I can fund this one, so I have a little time on my hands.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”