Is this legit: 360 1962

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

apossibleworld
New member
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:25 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by apossibleworld »

I should say I'm beyond excited about it! Same as your own story of discussing it with them, I just needed a quick way of payment to make sure I get the guitar in hand before I leave on a trip in a few days. No funny business :)
apossibleworld
New member
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:25 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by apossibleworld »

Preliminary report: cosmetic appearance is worse than the pictures showed. some binding reglued or replaced at bridge, and some rough areas on the back of the neck. Despite that, I think I'm in love. This is a guitar I'm gonna use. A lot. The neck angle is fine. The action is where it should be and there's room to go down a little.

Somebody else played this guitar, like everyday for 40 years, it looks like. I wish I knew the story behind it.
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by winston »

Hey congrats Robbie. Thanks for the updates. I hope this all works out for you. :D
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by xcoyle »

Robbie, what is the serial number? Mine is BH424 August 1962.

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... 6order%3D5
apossibleworld
New member
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:25 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by apossibleworld »

It seems to be double stamped, but the more legible one is BE193. It's hard to make out the other things that are stamped on top. Are there other double-stamped serials out there?
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by xcoyle »

I have heard about other double stamped plates. It is one sweet guitar, congrats.
User avatar
Scastles
Senior Member
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:19 am
Contact:

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by Scastles »

xcoyle wrote:I have heard about other double stamped plates. It is one sweet guitar, congrats.

Same here. I've heard of this too. Most likely somewhere on this same forum. BTW, David, that's not a shabby 365 you have. Not one little bit.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6371
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by paologregorio »

Congrats!

Does it have the "D" shaped neck profile I've noticed on other `62 models, as opposed to a "C" shape?
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6957
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by collin »

congrats Robbie, that is one seriously COOL Rickenbacker. 8)

Glad it has found a good home (I figured it wouldn't last long, either).


As usual, it appears CME didn't fully describe the instrument, but it sounds like you had it easier than some other board members' experiences. :wink:
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by xcoyle »

Thanks Stan. As you can probably tell from the photo's, it was once in Ron's collection. I do not have the talent or equipment for photos like those.
apossibleworld
New member
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:25 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by apossibleworld »

paologregorio wrote:Congrats!

Does it have the "D" shaped neck profile I've noticed on other `62 models, as opposed to a "C" shape?
Yes I would call it a D shape. It's quite comfortable.

If I may continue with my rambling observations: when it arrived, it was strung up with 9s, and it would not stay in tune. But after putting 10s on it holds its tuning perfectly. Maybe the Accent requires higher tension to function properly? There's no bar on it, so I haven't been able to use it for vibrato yet.

I also noticed that the body binding seems to be thicker than on other photos I've seen... it stands out in a very striking way, which I like a lot. Sometimes from a distance you might mistake the body of a 365 for a 335, but not in this case. Maybe I'm just imagining that though.
User avatar
Danhalen
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by Danhalen »

Congratulations this is a truly beautiful guitar! I would like to have one like it some day! Wow!
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4254
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by libratune »

Just get yourself a 360V64 FG, put on some gold plastic and start playing the heck out of it! In 30 years it just might look like this one!
Danhalen wrote:Congratulations this is a truly beautiful guitar! I would like to have one like it some day! Wow!
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by ozover50 »

Wow!! Some serious mojo there Robbie..... congrats!! :D
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
Danhalen
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Is this legit: 360 1962

Post by Danhalen »

libratune wrote:Just get yourself a 360V64 FG, put on some gold plastic and start playing the heck out of it! In 30 years it just might look like this one!
:lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”