Tom Petersson's 4001
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
This could be a completely reversable mod as long as there were no extra holes drilled in the bass to mount the guard. Then again...it just looks plain weird to have no bridge pickup at all.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
Looks cool. It also kinda looks like PW on Gretsch!

Looks like he put something in place for bigger pole heads.
Looks like he put something in place for bigger pole heads.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I think it looks great!
If you never use the bridge PU, seems like a logical mod to me. Petersson favors the neck PU on all his basses, going so far has to take out the bridge PU on some of his Waterstone 12 string basses, leaving a gaping cavity where the PU once was.
If you never use the bridge PU, seems like a logical mod to me. Petersson favors the neck PU on all his basses, going so far has to take out the bridge PU on some of his Waterstone 12 string basses, leaving a gaping cavity where the PU once was.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
To each his own. Sounds to me like all he needed to do was remove the pickup cover and flip the switch up. But it's his bass to do with as he pleases.
Always needing to inject my opinion though, I gotta say... I see (and hear) absolutely no benefit/improvement to this mod other than reducing the weight of the bass.
Always needing to inject my opinion though, I gotta say... I see (and hear) absolutely no benefit/improvement to this mod other than reducing the weight of the bass.
- coolingitdown
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:47 am
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
But if it was an original horseshoe, then the surround was magnetized and therefore could not be removed.
Then again, if you weren't going to use that pick up anyway, I suppose there wouldn't be any harm in removing the surround. To each his own, I suppose.
Then again, if you weren't going to use that pick up anyway, I suppose there wouldn't be any harm in removing the surround. To each his own, I suppose.
2010 4003 FG
1997 4003FL Turquoise
Set neck 4001S (color TBD)
1997 4003FL Turquoise
Set neck 4001S (color TBD)
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I think it is really cool. It's not like the bass was butchered or anything. If he wanted, he could have it reverted back to a regular 4001. I am seriously thinking of doing this at some point, as I rarely use the bridge PU and mainly use the neck PU.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
By that time (actually, quite a bit before that timeframe) the 4001 had a hi-gain pickup in that position, the horseshoe pickup was gone by around '68-'69.coolingitdown wrote:But if it was an original horseshoe, then the surround was magnetized and therefore could not be removed.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
From what I have read, Petersson originally had a blue Rick 4001 he bought in 1969 but did not like how the HS PU got in the way of his playing. So he later bought the '72 4001 and had it modified to be a neck PU only bass.
I think it looks really unique, with the binding and MG finish. I have never been a MG fan, but this bass looks really great IMO.
It really isn't that outrageous a modification. People have purchased 4000 basses and modified them to be a 4001, which is a much more radical mod.
I think it looks really unique, with the binding and MG finish. I have never been a MG fan, but this bass looks really great IMO.
It really isn't that outrageous a modification. People have purchased 4000 basses and modified them to be a 4001, which is a much more radical mod.
Last edited by RobRick on Fri May 06, 2011 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I agree.RobRick wrote:It really isn't that outrageous a modification
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I like this mod. My first Rick was a 4000 and (since my second Rick was a 4001 FL) I knew I missed a neck pickup. I like the simple look of the 4000. I like neck pickups sounds wise. This mod makes sense to me.
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I really like that bass! Good video!
Leprosy is rare & scarce but nobody wants that!
- gearhed289
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
+1!RobRick wrote:I think it looks really unique, with the binding and MG finish. I have never been a MG fan, but this bass looks really great IMO.
It really isn't that outrageous a modification.
'89 4003S, '92 4001CS, '93 4003S/8
www.nomadichorizonband.com
www.nomadichorizonband.com
- BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
- Professional Player
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
RobRick wrote:I think it looks great!
If you never use the bridge PU, seems like a logical mod to me. Petersson favors the neck PU on all his basses, going so far has to take out the bridge PU on some of his Waterstone 12 string basses, leaving a gaping cavity where the PU once was.
kinda like the gretsch guitar malcolm young plays with ac/dc with the two pickups out of it.
Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
This might look good as a single pickup bass.

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001
I have it on good authority that Tom used a 4001v63 on one of the songs on their latest album
