Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Setup, repair and restoration of Rickenbacker Instruments

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by teb »

And Todd, your 370WB is a '92 (despite the mods, just trying to get my assumptions right)?
I don't know.....it's red........The decoder says 1991.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by paologregorio »

IIRC, the string spacing was designed to emulate George's from day one. :D
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by ken_j »

Keep in mind the C63 has a 7.25" crown raduis fretboard. The others are 10". In my opinion this amkes a big difference in feel. I prefer the 7.25". True vintage Ricks were 7.25".
"The best things in life aren't things."
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by Folkie »

How does the rounder fretboard radius affect playability?
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by ken_j »

Folkie wrote:How does the rounder fretboard radius affect playability?
It is easier for chording. Plus theoretically it gives you a little more space. I'm sure it's mot much but I seem to be able to chord more cleanly on a C63 compared to a V64.
"The best things in life aren't things."
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by Folkie »

I'm extrapolating from my knowledge of Fenders, so forgive me if I'm a little off-base here. Would the rounder radius mean that the guitar's action would be higher (My guess is no, since I won't be doing any real bending on a 12-string)?
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by Folkie »

JimK,

I read your recent post comparing your 2009 360/12 to Gary Clauson's 1989 370/12 RM, in which you said you noticed a difference in string-spacing. Could you elaborate a little on what you said?

Robert
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by ken_j »

Folkie wrote:I'm extrapolating from my knowledge of Fenders, so forgive me if I'm a little off-base here. Would the rounder radius mean that the guitar's action would be higher (My guess is no, since I won't be doing any real bending on a 12-string)?
You answered your own question.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by sloop_john_b »

stsang wrote: I always wondered if Misters F.C.Hall or Roger Rossmeisl had small hands and that's why the guitars ended up with such narrow necks. I love the narrow necks. It feels strange to me when I play other guitars, for example the Gibson SG-12.
Roger had nothing to do with the electric 12-string as he had left the company several years prior. F.C. Hall was not a musician IIRC.
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by stsang »

sloop_john_b wrote:
stsang wrote: I always wondered if Misters F.C.Hall or Roger Rossmeisl had small hands and that's why the guitars ended up with such narrow necks. I love the narrow necks. It feels strange to me when I play other guitars, for example the Gibson SG-12.
Roger had nothing to do with the electric 12-string as he had left the company several years prior. F.C. Hall was not a musician IIRC.
I had read on the Rickenbacker web page http://www.rickenbacker.com/history_modern.asp
that Roger Rossmeisl designed the Capri series of guitars which had "slim and narrow 'fast action' necks". My understanding (possibly wrong) is that the 300 series guitars (both 6 and 12 strings) are descended directly from the Capri series designs. So, was Roger Rossmeisl indirectly responsible for the narrow necks on 300 series 12-strings?
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by Folkie »

I'm in a real quandary here. I can't afford a new 360/12C63 at the moment. I'd like to have the octave pairs on my 2010 360/12 spaced wider, but I'm not sure there's anyone local who has the expertise to do the job. My plan is to order up a 12-saddle bridge and have my nut replaced. I'll have to do some precise measurements of my 1991 330/12 to make sure the string-spacing on the 360 is just right.

The real question is, whom do I trust to do this mod? I bought the guitar from Chris Clayton at POTR, and his setup was spot on. But is there someone else, Jingle-Jangle perhaps, who might have more experience modifying nuts and installing 12-saddle bridges?

Robert
Last edited by Folkie on Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by JakeK »

Folkie wrote:The real question is, whom do I trust to do this mod? I bought the guitar from Chris Clayton at POTR, and his setup was spot on. But people here rave about Jingle-Jangle's work, and he might have more experience modifying nuts and installing 12-saddle bridges. Can anyone give me some words of advice?

Robert
if Chris is closer to you, take it to him, and maybe ask him for advice on your guitar's nut problem.
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by Folkie »

Thanks, Jake. I live in Ohio, and Chris is in New Jersey. I spoke to him today about replacement bridge screws, but not yet on the subject of the mod I'm considering. I didn't mean to question his knowledge; he clearly is an expert when it comes to all things Rickenbacker.
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by stsang »

Folkie wrote:Thanks, Jake. I live in Ohio, and Chris is in New Jersey. I spoke to him today about replacement bridge screws, but not yet on the subject of the mod I'm considering. I didn't mean to question his knowledge; he clearly is an expert when it comes to all things Rickenbacker.
Sorry to hear you're not 100% happy with your Ric. I didn't buy my Ric from Chris (he's the wrong side of New Jersey from me) but I've ordered several parts from him and he seems to be a good guy and extremely knowledgeable. Who knows - he may even offer exchange terms if your heart is really set on a Rick 360/12C63 (and he has one in stock)? Let us know how it goes!
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons

Post by jimk »

JakeK wrote:Paging Jim Krause: I think your thoughts on your baby 360/12 from '09 vs Gary Clauson's Roger McGuinn LE from '89 would be appreciated! :wink: :D
I've been away for a couple of days. Anyhow......I don't think I noticed much of a difference in the feel of Gary Clauson's McGuinn LE and my '09 360/12. The detail that was immediately apparent was the closer string spacing of the courses. I didn't really spend that much time with Gary's guitar and so couldn't put it through its paces, so to speak. Bear in mind though, that I'm used to smallish instruments; banjo, fiddle, mandolin, and have overheard observations that I have long, skinny fingers. So I don't think I'm really much help here. All I can say is my '09 works for me, and I've no doubt that if it were a late '80s McGuinn LE, that I could get along just fine.
JimK
Post Reply

Return to “"Vibrola" Rickenbacker Technical Forum: By Paul Wilczynski”