Page 2 of 5

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:20 pm
by randym
I stripped it down and a friend of mine did the paintjob. It's not a great job. There are a few runs on it and the paint is cracking. It may be worth while re-refinishing it again.

Image

Image

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:22 pm
by randym
It did have the two quarter inch jacks for the output, so that should help date it. I think the logo plate was missing when I got it, so I mae a custom brass place to go with the rest of the scheme.

Image

Let me know what you guys think!

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:31 pm
by sloop_john_b
Hmmmm. Perhaps a '72 based on headstock shape?

If the pots are original you can date it that way.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:48 pm
by randym
sloop_john_b wrote:Hmmmm. Perhaps a '72 based on headstock shape?

If the pots are original you can date it that way.
I did a quick look and I'm sure those were replaced when I installed the EMG's on it.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:52 pm
by leftybass
randym wrote:ok, here are the pics as promised. First my 64. I bought this in 78 when I was 16. Up until two days ago, I thought it was a 68. Ran the serial and by was I surprised!

Image
Very nice, Randy. Super 4001 you have there. I'm wondering how late in '64 it was made--many of the late '64 Ricks have a darker Fireglow like your bass....

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:04 pm
by randym
leftybass wrote:
randym wrote:ok, here are the pics as promised. First my 64. I bought this in 78 when I was 16. Up until two days ago, I thought it was a 68. Ran the serial and by was I surprised!
Very nice, Randy. Super 4001 you have there. I'm wondering how late in '64 it was made--many of the late '64 Ricks have a darker Fireglow like your bass....
Thanks. I was lucky to get it when I did. Bought it from a guy that lived with my brother. The serial is DK559 and it says it was made in November of 64. You know your stuff!

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:07 pm
by wints
leftybass wrote:
randym wrote:ok, here are the pics as promised. First my 64. I bought this in 78 when I was 16. Up until two days ago, I thought it was a 68. Ran the serial and by was I surprised!

Image
Very nice, Randy. Super 4001 you have there. I'm wondering how late in '64 it was made--many of the late '64 Ricks have a darker Fireglow like your bass....
Welcome Randy...

As John mentions, that's a really cool '64 you have there, and there aren't many deluxe 4001's from this year, so it's a rare bird. I'm guessing it's part of the late batch that seemed to be made with a Dec and DL serial number. Try and find that horseshoe pick up bobbin, as that would really make it cool from an originality standpoint.

I'd agree with JB on the white bass, probably a 72, or a 71 maybe...

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:07 pm
by wints
One month out...

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:20 pm
by matt-taylor
Lovin' your basses :D

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:56 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:44 pm
by sloop_john_b
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.
Did MD have crushed pearl inlays or poured?

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:16 am
by jps
I don't think so, wasn't CP phased out by MC?

I love it when we talk code! :mrgreen:

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 3:15 am
by Danotron
I speak this code!

My MD is poured full width, my wife's ME is poured smaller triangles, both have checkered binding :wink:

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:00 am
by T.A.R.
Great pics Randy, I love the '64. Good luck with 71/72 8)

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:07 am
by sloop_john_b
So how's the horseshoe pickup on your '64? Still sounding strong?