Page 3 of 4

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:55 am
by apollo11
$700 is not at all bad when you need that pickup. The value of a 68 4001 with a missing HS would increase by a lot more than the $700 if you popped this pickup into it. If I had a 68 or close, I would have been thrilled to have a chance at this pickup for what it sold for.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:55 am
by ken_swearingen
I told you[in my last post] I knew one person that would buy this and he did

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:09 am
by wints
A little late...but whatever...

Simply put, it was very good value. If you need a period correct one for your original 60's bass, (and these are all now getting worth close to a 5 figure sum) it's a no brainer...

Personally, they are a compromise on my playing style and I have come to the conclusion that they are overrated. If you want to restore an original bass from the 64-68 period, then, you should have one, but I think they are much more a visual than a sonic issue.

And with current prices for reissues and originals, it's surely only a matter of time before RIC reissues them again.

I saw this at 5am this morning and thought about it for my 67 project. The bass has the original finished stripped, and therefore is never going to be total "factory" and I would much rather have a period hi-gain without the cover for function and playing style than horseshoes.

Saying that, I knew that if Vincent had not seen it by lunchtime I was going to buy it anyway...

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:14 am
by jnbass
Image
Willll-bur.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:11 am
by nbvbn
Thank you for the grace period Andrew. I needed it bad for a very good 64 that was 100% minus the horse

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:23 am
by bob_atherton
Hell, if I had a 64 I would have bought it as well!

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:48 am
by philipharris
That wouldn't be that 25k 64 that was around recently, would it?

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:07 pm
by henry5
Quote: "No pickup is worth $700.or $400.Its the ignorant people who hear the word horseshoe that go all nuts."

I paid around $350 or so for my reissue h/shoe for my CS. Why? Because it didn't have the original pickup in it, and I wanted it how it should've been. Would I have paid $400? Yes. Does that make me ignorant, having to spend that much to put my bass right because I can't get the part any other way?

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:46 pm
by bobcat
There's a difference between buying a horseshoe pickup for $700 and dropping it into a mid-90s 4003 and buying a horseshoe pickup for $700 and dropping it into an almost completely original early 1960s 4001. The former's value will increase by part of what the horseshoe was sold for, but you'd be better off keeping the 4003 intact and just selling the horseshoe if you were looking at it financially. The latter's value would skyrocket, way more than $700, considering how rare it is to find an early '60s Rickenbacker bass, much less one that is original. In that case, it's definitely a worthwhile investment.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:39 pm
by ken_swearingen
Shaun, you were restoring something back to factory correct thats different.

what I meant is people who have never heard or played a bass with a horseshoe go crazy over them and keep the price going up wards.

Horseshoes are by far way overrated.

why did Ric go with the hi-gain?Its a better more efficient pickup.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:59 pm
by ken_swearingen
Speaking of horseys,I found a 1980 jetglo 4003s today black split guard and trc with a toaster and a horsey,Im going to put a high gain back in does anyone want the bass its really clean plays great.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:08 pm
by bobcat
Wait, the toaster? What's the output on it, and how much do you want for it?

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:25 pm
by nbvbn
vintage parts ??? if so i will take it

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:28 pm
by ken_swearingen
Its a v63 horsey but the surround is the early 90s one, the toaster is a re-issue as well.

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:57 pm
by jnbass
pix!