Page 3 of 5

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:29 am
by jps
sloop_john_b wrote:So how's the horseshoe pickup on your '64? Still sounding strong?
I think it speaks quietly, at the moment. :wink:

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:30 am
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
sloop_john_b wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.
Did MD have crushed pearl inlays or poured?
mine were crushed like my '68. did not know at the time they were shells...thought it was like the sparkle stuff on drumkits back in the day !!!

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:49 am
by beatlefan
I absolutely love this '64 ..... thanks for the pics!!

Drooling is rare for me these days, but...... :D

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:18 pm
by badeggs
The '64 is amazing. Now find that bobbin! Half the charm of these is the horseshoe pickup with real, magnetized shoes...you'll want to get that working again, just from a value standpoint alone. They happen to sound really nice, too!

Sergio Silva here on the forum rewinds pickups, everyone swears by his work...

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:26 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
it's not polite to swear ! :wink:

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:20 pm
by randym
jps wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:So how's the horseshoe pickup on your '64? Still sounding strong?
I think it speaks quietly, at the moment. :wink:
Unfortunately, that is all too true. Pulled it out when I was just a dumb kid. Guess now, I'm a dumb adult! :D

I know it's in the garage at the old house. Just need to find it. It was one of my goals to get it cleaned out this weekend while the weather is so warm. 50's in Indiana during January...amazing!

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 pm
by wints
jps wrote:I don't think so, wasn't CP phased out by MC?

I love it when we talk code! :mrgreen:
I may recall an MC with MOP, but not an MD. Anyone?

Does this prove the mic has more cool than the scalpel? :wink:

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 pm
by randym
badeggs wrote:The '64 is amazing. Now find that bobbin! Half the charm of these is the horseshoe pickup with real, magnetized shoes...you'll want to get that working again, just from a value standpoint alone. They happen to sound really nice, too!

Sergio Silva here on the forum rewinds pickups, everyone swears by his work...
I'm guessing that it will need some work. That was the reason I pulled it in the first place. As I recall, it had almost no sound output at all.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:23 pm
by randym
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.
ok, I'm new to this, please define what the skunk strip is.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:24 pm
by wints
This is what your looking for Randy...
Image
Image

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:30 pm
by sloop_john_b
randym wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.
ok, I'm new to this, please define what the skunk strip is.
The skunk stripe is the strip of walnut/shedua that runs down the center of the bass.

It can be seen most clearly at the headstock. Note that the one on the right here has it, and the one on the left doesn't:

Image

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 pm
by randym
sloop_john_b wrote:
randym wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:check for skunk stripe to narrow it down !!! my MD had a headstock like that.
ok, I'm new to this, please define what the skunk strip is.
The skunk stripe is the strip of walnut/shedua that runs down the center of the bass.

It can be seen most clearly at the headstock. Note that the one on the right here has it, and the one on the left doesn't:

Image
Yep, it's got the skunk stripe Image

BTW, nice basses, but it looks like the built those backwards! :D

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:15 pm
by randym
wints wrote:This is what your looking for Randy...
Image
Image
I'm in the process of getting moved. We started Labor Day weekend with everything we need to live, and the garage at the old house is a mess to say the least. I've only been able to work on getting it ready to sell on the weekends and this one is to get the junk out of the garage and hopefully find the bobbin in the process. At least I have incentive to get it cleaned out now!

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:32 pm
by jps
randym wrote:I'm guessing that it will need some work. That was the reason I pulled it in the first place. As I recall, it had almost no sound output at all.
It may also be that the coil is fine but the magnets need to be recharged.

Re: checker binding years

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:42 pm
by randym
jps wrote:
randym wrote:I'm guessing that it will need some work. That was the reason I pulled it in the first place. As I recall, it had almost no sound output at all.
It may also be that the coil is fine but the magnets need to be recharged.
And of course this leads to the question, how does one go about doing that?