Page 6 of 6
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:15 pm
by drkatherine1
1955 boomer.........dang..........makes me feel even older to know my daughters are 33 and 28.....where has the time gone?
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:14 pm
by Scastles
It's been just over a week since I started this thread. It could go on indefinitely...
I thought the post-Boomers would exceed the number of us, ahem, older folks. Didn't happen, but on the upside for the younger group there could be a lot of Rickenbackers available in a couple of decades, or so.
The percentages never varied much, coming only as close as about 6%.
Thanks for partaking in this pointless endeavour and your check is in the mail.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:05 pm
by dlandau
Boomer here too. 1948.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:22 pm
by johnallg
Stan, the younger Rick'ers are probably out playing live gigs while us old fart boomers are posting on this thread!
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:13 am
by chronictown
Born in '73. Weller and Marr were my Harrison and McGuinn
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:35 am
by rickboy88
March 1962 (later boomer). Just had my birthday on Thursday.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:59 am
by windchimp
rickboy88 wrote:March 1962 (later boomer). Just had my birthday on Thursday.
Happy Birthday!
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:40 pm
by jps
Happy belated birthday, David!
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:05 pm
by Scastles
johnallg wrote:Stan, the younger Rick'ers are probably out playing live gigs while us old fart boomers are posting on this thread!
Could be, John, could be.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:22 pm
by mike_d
1965, just past the cutoff.