Select early, select often.
If you were born before 1946, we'll get back to you.
No discrimination intended. Hopefully, none taken.Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
It seems this forum is a near equal divide of Rickenbacker 'boomers' (I hate the phrase) and those of latter birth years. However, how many belong to what? I tend to think there is a definite edge to those born after 1964, which IMHO, is a good thing. It quells the notion only folks of the '60's have any use for a Rickenbacker. Where do you fall?
Select early, select often.
If you were born before 1946, we'll get back to you. No discrimination intended. Hopefully, none taken.
Select early, select often.
If you were born before 1946, we'll get back to you.
No discrimination intended. Hopefully, none taken.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Boomer here, Stan......... born in '51.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Right there with you, Aitch. Same year, and a couple of months away from moving it up another notch.
-
incubus2432
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
'68......I'm stunned every day that I'm actually an adult age. 
Last edited by incubus2432 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
At first glance, Brian, I thought to myself, "he's 68". Just bad eyesight. It happens to you later.
Just bad eyesight. It happens to you later.-
incubus2432
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Sometimes after work I certainly feel 68......does that count?buzfluhart wrote:At first glance, Brian, I thought to myself, "he's 68".
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Boomer here, too. Born in early '52.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Yup, guilty as charged, Stan. Boomer born in '53
JimK
JimK
-
bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
A "Forty Niner" here.
-
paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
When I saw this topic heading, I thought it was regarding some sort of guitar or bass string...seriously! 
-
beatlefreak
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Born in '57.
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
51
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Boomer here too.
Remember, it's not the age, it's the mileage....and my clock spun a few times over!
Remember, it's not the age, it's the mileage....and my clock spun a few times over!
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
Ehhhhh, you younguns!!paologregorio wrote:When I saw this topic heading, I thought it was regarding some sort of guitar or bass string...seriously!
-
paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacker Boomers v. The Rest
No kidding. I should know better; I'm the youngest of six kids, the rest of whom qualify as boomers...johnallg wrote:Ehhhhh, you younguns!!paologregorio wrote:When I saw this topic heading, I thought it was regarding some sort of guitar or bass string...seriously!