Tarrbot wrote:Great repair Joey.
For those interested, Sherwin Williams was mentioned earlier in the thread. I did a review for a magazine way back years ago whereby I used S-W to paint a custom job on a computer case.
I can't recall which S-W I used but it was in the East Bay and I had it shipped.
The best thing about S-W is that they have automotive paints and they also have a scanner. You may have to call around to find the right S-W, and I believe in the phone book it's listed as something like Sherwin Williams Automotive Paints or something similar. They can also put these paints in a spray can, if you ever want to fix one of those HUGE chips.
All joking aside, the point being is that you can get some very close custom paints from S-W. It'll likely be costly, though. I think the paint I got nearly a decade ago was about $30 per can or so.
S-W was the supplier for RIC's conversion varnish for years.
All large paint manufacturers provide a computer matching service, as do individual paint supply stores. I have had less-than-perfect matches on virtually every sample I've brought in for this type of matching, however. The reason is that nearly all paints (exceptions: pure white, pure black, pure silver) in this type of formulation (urethane enamels these days, and soon to be supplanted by waterborne coatings) dry darker than they appear in the can or on a wet sample.
The only foolproof way to match a color is by eye, in daylight, with backup match checks in fluorescent, halogen, and sodium vapor color temps. Typically using only a daylight match is considered sufficient. A sample of the newly-mixed color must be sprayed out on a non-absorbent surface and allowed to dry. It's then compared to the original color. Oftentimes a specially-built light box programmable for different color temps--called a "MacBeth Box" after the main manufacturer--is used.
Every automotive paint supplier I know of provides this service, at substantial additional cost (between $25 and $50 per use). I have been eye-matching colors since the early 1970s; the ability to do this accurately is a thing that one is "born with", in my experience.
This is made additionally difficult by the nature of a FG finish (or any burst) to have a transparency factor--bursts typically have at least one transparent tint (RIC bursts have one, Fender's bursts have two or three colors, one of which is opaque). Transparent tints, because they are see-through, must have not only the proper color characteristics (
hue--color family, as in red, brown, green, etc;
chroma, or saturation;
luminance, or brightness), but must also be applied in the correct thickness so that neither too much nor too little light passes through.
Fixing chips with a spray can is a recipe for disaster, and I would discourage any attempts at this. The problem with refinishing guitars with spray cans (sorry, ReRanch) is that not enough paint is applied to the surface to provide a durable film. If your intention is to make a guitar that will quickly relic, it's fine, but otherwise stick to spray guns and pro finishes.
Lastly, spray cans are undesirable from the standpoint of danger and waste. They cost a fortune to dispose of properly, and usually contain toxins. The overspray they generate is substantial when compared to that produced by a properly-set-up HVLP spray gun.
Waterborne coatings have been formulated by most suppliers for automotive use, in anticipation of the country-wide adoption of VOC regulations similar to those already in effect in Southern California and soon (October 2009) to go into effect in the SF Bay Area. However, clear coats (conversion varnishes) will continue to be solvent-borne, at least until durability of water-borne clear coats ceases to be an issue. This is still a number of years in the future, I'm told by my supplier.
Lastly, let me put in a plug for PPG. They are the best manufacturer of automotive (guitar) paints on the planet IMO, when one considers quality, ease of application, durability, and availability. I've gone through brief "relationships" with lots of other manufacturers over the years, but when I began using PPG products in the mid-1980s, I stayed with them and continue to use them exclusively.