350v63 Opinions?

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

350v63 Opinions?

Post by highway_star »

I've seen the 350v63 on-line and it looks interesting, but I don't have access to one. Does anyone here have any experience with them and if so, what are your impressions? I was considering that model or a 660.
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Ron: The 350V63 and the 660 are two very different guitars, based on sound and playability. What are you looking for in a guitar in terms of tonality and application?
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

I hadn't really thought that far into it. I was basically looking for a toaster-equipped solid-body guitar. How do they differ in your opinion?
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
Scastles
Senior Member
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:19 am
Contact:

Post by Scastles »

Slightly wider neck on the 660 for one thing.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
User avatar
wmthor
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:14 am

Post by wmthor »

Ron, the 350v63 is not a solid-body.
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Ron:

1. You will get greater sustain with the 660 as it has neck through as opposed to set neck construction.

2. The middle pickup on the Model 350 bothers some as it gets in the way of strumming and finger picking.

3. The stock wiring of the three pickups won't allow for neck and bridge only configuration as you can get with the 660 and other two pickup models.

4. The body shape of the 350 and 660 feel different from one another.

5. There is more room on the 660 fretboard than the 350 fretboard if that matters to you.

6. There are presently less 660s than 350s out there if you are looking for something a little different.

7. The 660 weights 8 pounds compared to the 7 pound Model 350.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

That answers a lot, Peter. I have access to a Montezuma Brown 660 and so I may give it a try this weekend.

This may sound a bit odd, but my wife and I thought my 381v69 was reminiscent of a Tele with the bridge pickup on. Before I was corrected, I was hoping to get the same feel in a solid body design. It looks like the 660 may be a good candidate. Telecasters are very common, but how often do you see a 660 at a jam or gig?
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
steverok
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:16 pm
Contact:

Post by steverok »

Telecasters are very cool also, and they rock better than Ric's! I have one in chrome red. Every collection should have at least one Ric-6, one Ric-12, and one Tele as far as I'm concerned!
Am I allowed to say this on this forum?
"Say what you like about the tenets of national socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos." - Walter Sobchak.
highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

Say all you want as far I'm conerned. My collection isn't exclusively made up of Rickenbackers.
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
roadrunners
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:15 pm
Contact:

Post by roadrunners »

I myself would shoot for the 350....great body design.....different then most....looks more expensive then it is (although it is expensive....usually people are reminded that john lennon used something that resmebled it...325) The 660 has too wide a neck for me...I can relate playing it to playing a classical guitar (at least for me)
"This is my personal quote"
popster15
New member
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 11:06 am

Post by popster15 »

The 350 makes a better 6 string....the 660 makes a better 12 string. My opinion.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

All interesting comments and important points to consider when trying to decide between a 350 and a 660.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

"Telecasters are very cool also, and they rock better than Ric's!"

Sorry Steve, we all feel diferently, but Teles do NOT rock better than Rics. Teles are great gtrs, with plenty of tone & charachter, but if you can't get a Ric to 'rock' better, then you're not playing them right. My album 'Stupidly Cool', by my band 'The Rampant Carnivores' is rock & everything was Ric. I put some Tele on it at the beginning, but recorded over it as it was just too soft compared to the Rics.
It is fair to say though, that I do not play Rics as a lot of users do...I am extremely aggressive. Through a 100w Marshall head & 2 Marshall 4x12's, believe me....Rics rock!
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

Try any Ric through this & it'll eat a Tele for breakfast...

Image
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
User avatar
steverok
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:16 pm
Contact:

Post by steverok »

I guess for me, they do, but I appreciate your enthusiasm and position on this matter. Besides, I'm only a rocking drummer, I am not a rocking guitar player. I almost cry every time I see a black 360, because I don't have one - you rock, man.
"Say what you like about the tenets of national socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos." - Walter Sobchak.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”