Horseshoe Options

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Horseshoe Options

Post by gareth »

OK, so I've scored a new RIC horseshoe. I have four options now.

1. Replace the Lollar horseshoe in the '79 4001
2. Install it in the '74 4001
3. Replace the pup in the 4000 with it
4. Route a big hole in the 4004LK and nail it in place with fencing nails

I'm thinking #3

Any opinions ?
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Option 4(A) Ship it to me ... ;)
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

5. Give to me.

I guess it comes down to which of the basses do you least like the tone of.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

I asked first .... !!!

But if you are going to insist on keeping it then I'd agree with Option 3.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Post by jdogric12 »

I'm leaning toward #1. Then you could sell the Lollar (although I'm not too sure what that is - my bass pu k'nowledge is limited). If #2 is original, don't mess with it. #3 is an unusual model, so I wouldn't mess with it either.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

J, Jason Lollar is a pickup maker, and produced a horseshoe pickup for a while.

http://www.lollarguitars.com/
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the 4004 is not thick enough to put in a horseshoe pickup ...
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

I think if he was serious about nailing a horseshoe onto an LK, body thickness would be the least of his problems.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Jeff's correct. It appears that Lemmy has a bridge hi-gain on his bass, but it is actually just the "cover" so he can anchor his hand.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Yep. It's quirky, but it's clearly a Lemmy feature - I wonder whhy RIC didn't put it on the signature models?
basshawk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 9:10 pm

Post by basshawk »

#3 I have a re-issue in my '68 4000 and it sounds great. You won't be dissapointed.
Is everybody ready?
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the cover on the Lemmy bass is a hand rest ... there is no pickup under it ...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I suspect that the LK did not get the surround and cover because it is ugly as hell on a 4004. IMHO anyway.
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Post by gareth »

I think I should mention at this point that option #4 should not be taken seriously.

I'm leaning towards #3

On another note, the LK is noticeably lighter than the 4001's. It has a much more bright and aggressive tone. I suspect that the third pickup addresses this as it sounds a little too toppy when switched in two pickup mode. When all three are on, it sounds awesome. Every time I've seen Motorhead live in the last few years, I suspect tone isn't a problem for him, as his bass is so bright and distorted, it sounds almost like a baritone guitar. I don't think an extra pickup would make much difference to that sound.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

As fast and loud as Lemmy plays it probably doesn't matter what brand of bass he uses ...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”