A case against VVT on a 4004
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
A case against VVT on a 4004
It's a small thing, but BIG in my eyes. When I am playing up tempo stuff, I have the switch in the down position and play behind the bridge, for mellow stuff in the upper position and play up the neck. I put the tone halfway and the vol max. I also have her middle position for a third tone. The mids are boosted on the amp, with everything else flat. It's a quick flip to get both sounds I need. It would seem a more difficult operation with a VVT setup, no?
-
jwr2
for me I get the best tones out of any 2 pickup bass when one pickup is at 10 and the other is at 7 ... this goes for pretty much every 2 pickup bass that I have ever played ... so one toggle, one volume, and one tone will never give me the tone I desire most ...
However I do like a guitar wired toggle, volume, tone ...
most 2 pickup basses will give you a way to blend the pickups ...
However I do like a guitar wired toggle, volume, tone ...
most 2 pickup basses will give you a way to blend the pickups ...
I agree with Charley that I've never felt compelled that the 4004 needs the extra flexibility. Seems like a valid idea, I prefer the idea of dual concentrics however, but I'm happy enough the way it is.
I did finally play my J bass through my new LDS 4x8 cab and I did like the tones, so I might be thinking again about the concentrics harness for the 4004...hmmmm...
But it's not like I dislike anything about the sounds I'm getting out of the Laredo. It's all a very circular argument that can quickly lead to neurosis...
I did finally play my J bass through my new LDS 4x8 cab and I did like the tones, so I might be thinking again about the concentrics harness for the 4004...hmmmm...
But it's not like I dislike anything about the sounds I'm getting out of the Laredo. It's all a very circular argument that can quickly lead to neurosis...

Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
I don't like VVT. Something that drew me to a Rick bass originally was that it had a selector switch - something that many (most?) basses don't. Love having it.
I like the concentric setup and will probably go with it for my Laredo when I get it back in playing shape. In the end, though, the 4001/4003 nails it for me.
I like the concentric setup and will probably go with it for my Laredo when I get it back in playing shape. In the end, though, the 4001/4003 nails it for me.
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
I have my bridge vol on full with the front pu on 7. They stay that way always. Sometimes I will select just the front or rear as needed, but I don't touch the vol's.
On my Jazz, I do the same, but then I leave it there for everything. I just change my finger location and attack as needed.
On my Jazz, I do the same, but then I leave it there for everything. I just change my finger location and attack as needed.
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
Having one resistor at about 70% and the other at 100% strikes some mental note from college physics. Something about the inverse of the number "e" (about 2.72) playing a role...rf circuits are "best" at (1 - 1/e), about 63.3%.
"7" is a good approximation - you are in the potentiometers "sweet spot".
The other one is cranking.
Some folks love with their pu's direct to the output jack...some need the ultimate flexibility of the 4001/3 design. Some need a P bass, some like it VVT.
"7" is a good approximation - you are in the potentiometers "sweet spot".
The other one is cranking. Some folks love with their pu's direct to the output jack...some need the ultimate flexibility of the 4001/3 design. Some need a P bass, some like it VVT.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
