50 UGLIEST GUITARS OF THE YEAR

[jingle_jangle]

Maybe some of you have already seen this, but for the rest:

http://www.guitarsite.com/news/features ... 007_50_30/

These are great for a chuckle!

And to top off the year's festivities, I saw another mvpgretsch creation on the 'Bay. Not a new one; apparently he's dissolving his "collection" to finance that '55 Cadillac restoration.

I wonder if it'll get a Cadillac tailpiece?

[ozover50]

Aw geeeeeeez!! How the hell do I get the vomit out of my keyboard.

[lyle_from_minneapolis]

Now, I won't name names...but not every one of those offended me...

But the ones that did more than made up for the judgmental lapse.

[bitzerguy]

No. 20 is too far down the list IMO. Bleagh!! Should be No 1, with No 8 right behind it. Good grief!!

[sowhat]

I'd vote for # 49 and # 22 as the ugliest.

[johnallg]

I only saw 49 guitars..... where was #46?

[jimk]

Whoever created No. 20 should be put in jail. That one's a crime.

JimK

[johneek]

How do you say, "Uggghhhhhh" 50 times?

[beatlefreak]

When I follow the link to the page, it says that it shows Ugliest Guitars 50-30. But the page only shows numbers 50-40, and there isn't a link to the rest of them. What am I missing?

[johnallg]

Chris, halfway down the page on the right - before the comments section there is a link.

[melibreits]

Eeeeeeewwwww, eeeeeeewwwwwww, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWW!!!!!

Now why did I have to look at those before having breakfast..... HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

[nattiep]

What's wrong with 46? That design's been around for years. Shouldn't be on the list.

Are those the Crazy Babysitter Twins?!

[sloop_john_b]

What's wrong with 46? That design's been around for years.

Time wounds all heels.

[jingle_jangle]

Here's #51, although it's from 1965:

http://cgi.ebay.com/extremely-rare-1965 ... 0183851614

Does the word "proportion" mean anything to some folks?

And, someone please tell "Olivia" that "rare" does not necessarily equate with "valuable".

[johnallg]

Jeez.....