Recent comment about neck size by JH

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

gshadoan
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:23 pm

Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by gshadoan »

I recently read a post, that happend to hit one of my hot buttons.

An excerpt:
"It's a challenge we always seem to face, that when we satisfy one group of people, another group is made unhappy, and the main reason we don't make too many changes even when we know well there are improvements that we could make."

Which group of people were you trying to satisfy by pulling all 5-string bass production, with little or no explanation, and or, no time line for a re-introduction? I mean, if making people happy "is" what you are trying to do.

Just curious.
User avatar
captsandwich
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1312
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by captsandwich »

Probably the people who are waiting for a c64, or a FL, or........

They still have a 5 string 4004 on the website, so technically they are still making a 5 string bass. Or maybe not, they still have acoustics on the website too.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by tennis_nick »

Agreed. do you know how many people were upset when the 75th anniversary guitars came out?

"but what about my guitar that's already on order, now it gets bumped and takes even longer???"

12 string Headstock, huge improvement, some people still hate it!
gshadoan
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:23 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by gshadoan »

captsandwich wrote:Probably the people who are waiting for a c64, or a FL, or........

They still have a 5 string 4004 on the website, so technically they are still making a 5 string bass. Or maybe not, they still have acoustics on the website too.
Try ordering one. Just for fun. Technically they are not.
nukebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 6:21 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by nukebass »

It wouldn't surprise me if they quit producing the 4004, too. The only consistent run of those seems to be for NAMM, and then it's only three (TG,TB, and TR). When you figure the orders for 4003s, 330s and 360s dwarf others, I can understand it.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13214
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by rickenbrother »

If there was just at least one popular, influential bassist playing a 4004, the amount of orders for the 4004 would go crazy.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by johnallg »

They tried with Paul, but...... dang EC!
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by paologregorio »

tennis_nick wrote:12 string Headstock, huge improvement, some people still hate it!
I WISH my 381/12 had the new headstock!

So, do you full time bassists prefer the thicker or the thinner headstock? I like thin myself.
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by heinpete »

I like the thinner headstock of the 4001 and 4004, the current 4003 just looks too bulbous to me. Might optically apppear a little less bulbous with the walnut wings.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37505
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by jps »

I prefer the thinner necks.
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by berth »

rickenbrother wrote:If there was just at least one popular, influential bassist playing a 4004, the amount of orders for the 4004 would go crazy.
Actually there is. It is even played by the player who made me buy Ricks in the first place. There is a 4004 LK. But I still wont buy 4004's as they seem to have a wider neck and the excellent hand rest somehow is not on it anymore. :wink:
phlemmy

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by phlemmy »

big wings, small headstocks.
nukebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 6:21 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by nukebass »

I got a PM from John Hall regarding my comment above. My opinion was spoken out of ignorance and a little frustration for the long wait for my bass. In short, it appears comments like mine have stopped him from posting on this forum. Sorry everybody. I'll do my best to keep from repeating my mistake. :(
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13214
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by rickenbrother »

nukebass wrote:I got a PM from John Hall regarding my comment above. My opinion was spoken out of ignorance and a little frustration for the long wait for my bass. In short, it appears comments like mine have stopped him from posting on this forum. Sorry everybody. I'll do my best to keep from repeating my mistake. :(
Ryan your 4004 will be worth the wait, at least in my opinion. I think the are great basses. I doubt that RIC will drop the 4004 basses. As I have said to others who are waiting on a Rickenbacker instrument, it's really a nice thing to be waiting on a Rickenbacker instrument.
I'm one of many who enjoy John Hall's contributions to the forum. We've all learned quite a bit from him. It get's me P-O'ed when he is shown disrespect here, especially if it's done repeatedly from someone who should know better.
There are occasionally posts put on this forum that have me shaking my head and making me wanting to take a break from here, which I've done sometimes, like the post that started this thread...and anyone here that knows me well, knows I'm holding back quite a bit, because if i said what I'd really like to say,...
I should start my own thread, would really P-O at least a coiple of people here, but I'll shut up now and take a forum break.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: Recent comment about neck size by JH

Post by j_gary »

Hey Ryan, no worries about JH. Think Bobby Knight, a brilliant captain but won't take a shot over the bow with a gentle wave. I miss his appearances here as he often would dispense "head nuggies" to hecklers. I can't help but admire a CEO who cares enough to take the time to "school" us up in the cheap seats. I believe he grew weary of us savages long before your post. I think if he is ever able to build enough instruments to keep up with demand he may return.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”