What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
Don't look if you're having dinner / breakfast (depending on your time zone..)
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
We could say the same about Roger waters' or Jon Camp's Rics. But we don't.
Why did so many people want a Fender pickup there? My guess is the bass-cut capacitor made players think the original Ric pickups didn't have bottom end. They wanted a Ric that looks like a Ric and plays like a Ric but sounds like a bass.
Somehow you don't see many post-'85 Rics routed for a Gibson Sidewinder or a P split pickup.
Why did so many people want a Fender pickup there? My guess is the bass-cut capacitor made players think the original Ric pickups didn't have bottom end. They wanted a Ric that looks like a Ric and plays like a Ric but sounds like a bass.
Somehow you don't see many post-'85 Rics routed for a Gibson Sidewinder or a P split pickup.
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
I've got one that is... well, not quite as bad as that although I will need to replace wood under where the badass went and in the neck route as well. It seems that someone extended the route with a screwdriver.. and a phillips one at that! Mine does not have a funky P bass route as well though.
I do have some trouble with the people who got a rickenbacker only to try to convert it to a P bass. The P is a fine instrument and afforadable enough to have without chopping a rick!
emac.
I do have some trouble with the people who got a rickenbacker only to try to convert it to a P bass. The P is a fine instrument and afforadable enough to have without chopping a rick!
emac.
-
gray
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
At least its poor, slaughtered old carcass appears to come with a jackplate/toe tag so it can be identified. Good thing it comes with the wrong bridge and the wrong pickup and the wrong knobs.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
Good point about the post-'85 Rick basses, Ilan. It's true.ilan wrote: My guess is the bass-cut capacitor made players think the original Ric pickups didn't have bottom end. They wanted a Ric that looks like a Ric and plays like a Ric but sounds like a bass.
Somehow you don't see many post-'85 Rics routed for a Gibson Sidewinder or a P split pickup.
weemac wrote:I do have some trouble with the people who got a rickenbacker only to try to convert it to a P bass. The P is a fine instrument and afforadable enough to have without chopping a rick!
emac.
Not that I agree with this type of butchery, Eden but I can understand where the guy was coming from. As Ilan said above...The guy must have loved the way his Rick played, loved the neck, loved the balance, loved the look, but hated the tone.
A P-Bass is a different animal altogether and may not have been a good substitute. Maybe he loved the way a P-bass sounded but hated its neck, the way it balanced, the way it looked, etc.
Like I said...I don't agree with this level of butchery, but if you really love certain elements of your Bass but just a few things about it bug you, I see no problem in changing those few elements. But for me that would be things like...get the bridge saddles to work, remove the pickup cover, bypass the bass-cut capacitor...
Gotta love those knobs, BTW!
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
I'll bet they didn't bypass the cap when installing the Fender pickup and therefore still lacked the bottom of the P-bass.ilan wrote:
Why did so many people want a Fender pickup there? My guess is the bass-cut capacitor made players think the original Ric pickups didn't have bottom end. They wanted a Ric that looks like a Ric and plays like a Ric but sounds like a bass.
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
Thereafter, they gave up and bought a different bass, now we have to deal with these poor things.ricosound wrote:I'll bet they didn't bypass the cap when installing the Fender pickup and therefore still lacked the bottom of the P-bass.ilan wrote:
Why did so many people want a Fender pickup there? My guess is the bass-cut capacitor made players think the original Ric pickups didn't have bottom end. They wanted a Ric that looks like a Ric and plays like a Ric but sounds like a bass.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
But in this case, the P-bass pickup was installed in the neck position. And the neck pickup on a 4001 wasn't the one that was drained by the bass-cut capacitor.ricosound wrote:I'll bet they didn't bypass the cap when installing the Fender pickup and therefore still lacked the bottom of the P-bass.
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
...true enough. I guess this argument only applies when people put Jazz pickups and Seymour Duncans in the bridge position. Bartolinis and Alembics seem to be an acceptable upgrade around here for some reason. Back to the original point, if you want a p-bass sound buy a Fender.rickaddict wrote:But in this case, the P-bass pickup was installed in the neck position. And the neck pickup on a 4001 wasn't the one that was drained by the bass-cut capacitor.ricosound wrote:I'll bet they didn't bypass the cap when installing the Fender pickup and therefore still lacked the bottom of the P-bass.
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
I don't know about the Bart's, but my Alembic's are drop in replacements, NO routing, nothing! Even the chrome bridge pickup cover fits over the pickup.ricosound wrote:...true enough. I guess this argument only applies when people put Jazz pickups and Seymour Duncans in the bridge position. Bartolinis and Alembics seem to be an acceptable upgrade around here for some reason. Back to the original point, if you want a p-bass sound buy a Fender.rickaddict wrote:But in this case, the P-bass pickup was installed in the neck position. And the neck pickup on a 4001 wasn't the one that was drained by the bass-cut capacitor.ricosound wrote:I'll bet they didn't bypass the cap when installing the Fender pickup and therefore still lacked the bottom of the P-bass.
I'm working on getting a toaster cover to cover the neck pickup next.
-
myfretless
- Member
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 1:43 am
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
At least the jack plate is still on it.
Why is the strap button off-center by the bridge? Was it redone?
Why is the strap button off-center by the bridge? Was it redone?
Re: What is WRONG with people?! - Part Deux
It either stripped out or they put a different style in.myfretless wrote:At least the jack plate is still on it.
Why is the strap button off-center by the bridge? Was it redone?
