620/660 not recommended for male gender
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Not even close...
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Man Paul, those geetars make me cringe just lookin' at 'em.
JimK
JimK
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
The second one looks like a murder weapon, and I don't mean it could kill one person. It looks like it could have been used on the battle field during the Braveheart era.
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Let's not forget the vib arm on the Accent!!

- chronictown
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 12:09 pm
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
I still have an '80s pointy BC Rich from my philistine early-teenage years...tried on and off to sell it for years, now it's in the attic gathering dust. Never managed to geld myself on it but I think if I have boys they'll be encouraged to jam out on a certain other brand of guitar 
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
I have a neighbor and friend who is in his mid-seventies and has one of the largest and complete collections of...
B.C.Rich guitars on the West Coast.
Looking at him, you'd think he was a church organist...or at least a Gibson hollowbody collector, but nooooo...
Strange world, innit?
B.C.Rich guitars on the West Coast.
Looking at him, you'd think he was a church organist...or at least a Gibson hollowbody collector, but nooooo...
Strange world, innit?
- melibreits
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4081
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Haha.... They don't call 'em "axes" for nothing, LOL!steverok wrote:The second one looks like a murder weapon, and I don't mean it could kill one person. It looks like it could have been used on the battle field during the Braveheart era.
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
I've been playing guitars of that shape (650, 660/6, 660/12) for a few years, and am pleased to report no damage. I also play mine with a short enough strap that it would be very difficult to have a problem there. It is getting less likely by the day that I'll ever have a BC Rich Testicular Jabulator (tm).
A friend once used his guitar neck to relocate a rowdy (and very large) audience member from the stage and guide him back into the crowd. I'm ready with that trick if I need it.
A friend once used his guitar neck to relocate a rowdy (and very large) audience member from the stage and guide him back into the crowd. I'm ready with that trick if I need it.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
WOW!!! Keith Richards is a friend of yours???
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
That's certainly sufficiently strangejingle_jangle wrote:I have a neighbor and friend who is in his mid-seventies and has one of the largest and complete collections of...
B.C.Rich guitars on the West Coast.
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Me 'n' Keef go back a bit, but it was the guy who taught it to Keef of whom I am thinking.jingle_jangle wrote:WOW!!! Keith Richards is a friend of yours???
Do you know how much work Keith has to do to get his (remaining) teeth that color every day?
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
That's no big deal with the 600 series, but those guitars in the pictures are definitely dangerous to one's health and wellbeing. That whole pointy thing is soooooo eighties and passe, I think.
At least, IMO.
At least, IMO.
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: 620/660 not recommended for male gender
Those guitars should each come with a cup for the family jewels! 
