95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
targ
New member
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:49 pm

95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by targ »

So I have located one of these with some very nice birds-eye top and back in mapleglow. It is a 95 in what is said to be EXC condition. What is a fair price? they want 4K

(the last time I posted a link here to what I thought was a good deal someone snagged it before me) so I won't link it lol.
User avatar
targ
New member
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by targ »

User avatar
rick_ovic
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by rick_ovic »

Marty,

I understand that the 6 string 381V69 is rarer than the 12 string version. The example you've posted is a sweet guitar for sure, however $4K is not a bargain. More recently I've seen used examples selling for under $3000.

Check out this thread also:-

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=384427
'59 425, '59 335, '60 335, '60 360, '60 335F, '60 345F, '64 RM 1999, '65 RM 1998, '65 360-12, '66 335, '67 450-12, '72 4001 '72 4001, '75 4000, '75 4000CS, '00 700S, '01 700C, '01 700S-12, '01 730S-FH, '06 660 DCM
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by doctorwho »

Considering that a new one has a list price of $4949, $4000 isn't that bad. Of course, if one were to order one, one probably could get a better price, but then there is the wait.

If I were after it, I might offer $3800 + shipping and see whether the seller would accept it.

Edit - Darren is right, but remember that supply and demand can make the prices fluctuate. It boils down to two things: (1) how much do you 'have to have it', and (2) how committed is the seller to selling it.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
targ
New member
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by targ »

Then, there is the gamble you even get figured wood with Ric. /sigh
User avatar
targ
New member
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by targ »

rick_ovic wrote:Marty,

I understand that the 6 string 381V69 is rarer than the 12 string version. The example you've posted is a sweet guitar for sure, however $4K is not a bargain. More recently I've seen used examples selling for under $3000.

Check out this thread also:-

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=384427

wow, I see what you mean, Thanks
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by jdogric12 »

Yeah, I'm afraid I recently learned these are not what you think they're worth. ("you" collectively, not "you" personally) Way too high a price these days.
User avatar
Scastles
Senior Member
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:19 am
Contact:

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by Scastles »

In better economic conditions the seller could very well expect 4K. However, right now, it's a buyers market, IMO. I'd say 3 to 3200, tops.
User avatar
zrob
Junior Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:06 am

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by zrob »

This one sold three weeks ago. -Click- I believe the seller started out around 2.8k with no action. Some may recall the large chrome buttons over the pickguard screws; made the guitar look silly. (FYI, the buttons turned out to be those chrome caps you can put over your car's license-plate frames) The seller got wise (probably cuz I wrote him), removed the buttons, took new photos and re-listed the auction at a BIN of $2,249. It quickly sold. If you're from the more-is-better school, then this one was hard to beat, but I found the flame a bit much. They are beautiful guitars though, probably the best looking guitar from RIC, but I'm holding out for an FG. You gotta love that carve.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 95 381 v 69 mapleglow

Post by jingle_jangle »

I've been watching prices on these, and there's been (allowing for the usual anomalies in prices, onesies and twosies) less movement upward on 381V69s than on other Ricks.

Considering this and the current unexciting market, I'd say that no more than $3K would be fair, and $2800 more realistic.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”