Save me, Ted!!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Save me, Ted!!

Post by rickaddict »

User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12655
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by doctorwho »

Ironic that it would be on eBay around Easter, as it definitely would need to be brought back from the dead ... :D

(no offense intended, Christians! :) )
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
jc-sz
Junior Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by jc-sz »

I have just seen this and was thinking that, if it's straight, the neck would be a lot of fun for someone with a project... If this was happening at home, I would certainly buy it. I wouldn't even try to fake a Rick, rather make some use of a great neck for something different...

What about the skunk and the two truss rods? In my limited knowledge on the 4000series evolution, I thought the latter replaced the former... Is this a really early model?

Cheers!
'03 4003 FG VP
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by ilan »

In conjunction with a fretless 4003 this could be a fretted/fretless double-neck project.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by antipodean »

jc-sz wrote: What about the skunk and the two truss rods? In my limited knowledge on the 4000series evolution, I thought the latter replaced the former... Is this a really early model?
It looks like a late '73 or '74 to me - the inlays, neck pickup rout (1/2 inch spacing) and skunk stripe all point to this. The skunk stripe was introduced in '72 as one of many efforts to strengthen the neck. As far as I know, the 4000 series basses have had two truss rods since inception.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by rickaddict »

antipodean wrote:
jc-sz wrote: What about the skunk and the two truss rods? In my limited knowledge on the 4000series evolution, I thought the latter replaced the former... Is this a really early model?
It looks like a late '73 or '74 to me - the inlays, neck pickup rout (1/2 inch spacing) and skunk stripe all point to this. The skunk stripe was introduced in '72 as one of many efforts to strengthen the neck. As far as I know, the 4000 series basses have had two truss rods since inception.
+1
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13201
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by rickenbrother »

rickaddict wrote:
antipodean wrote:
jc-sz wrote: What about the skunk and the two truss rods? In my limited knowledge on the 4000series evolution, I thought the latter replaced the former... Is this a really early model?
It looks like a late '73 or '74 to me - the inlays, neck pickup rout (1/2 inch spacing) and skunk stripe all point to this. The skunk stripe was introduced in '72 as one of many efforts to strengthen the neck. As far as I know, the 4000 series basses have had two truss rods since inception.
+1
Also possibly a '75, which also had the 1/2" route for a good part of the year. Nice looking flamed pattern in the neck stock.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by marc61 »

So let me ask this. Someone buys the thing, puts new body wings on, gets a trc, jackplate etc..is it a Ric?
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by winston »

Here's the same question posed differently, because this sort of thing goes on all the time with another brand of guitar. If you change the body or a neck on a Fender Stratcocaster is it still a Strat? Most Strat players would tell you yes. Fender themselves acknowledge that fact with their recreation of Rory Gallagher's Strat that did not have an original neck on it and had one oddball tuner. There's a story behind that tuner but I'll save that for another day. They also make the Highway One series. It was originally a nod to those of us who like to mod their instruments.

If this Rick is restored is it no less a Rickenbacker? I suspect that we will have divided camps on that question but I would vote yes it would be a Rickenbacker. The degree of restoration should not enter into the question.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by cjj »

So, if you start with just one headstock wing...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by winston »

cjj wrote:So, if you start with just one headstock wing...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: OK I'll play along is it an original headstock wing and who did the "restoration"? :lol: :lol:
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by JakeK »

Did this thing meet John Entwistle? :P
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by gareth »

cjj wrote:So, if you start with just one headstock wing...

If it's just this part and the rest is manufactured and restored using RIC hardware and the same woods, I'd say yes.

I'll bet there are more than a few of us who own basses that have been restored like this and can't tell the difference. I know I do.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by cjj »

OK, start with one RIC TRC, use the same woods and RIC hardware and what do you have?
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: Save me, Ted!!

Post by winston »

cjj wrote:OK, start with one RIC TRC, use the same woods and RIC hardware and what do you have?
That would not qualify as a restoration project in my mind. :lol:

I am willing to bet that Paul can help determine when work such as you mention crosses the line to become a replica and alternatively when it could be deemed a restoration project.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”