97 to current

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

97 to current

Post by jmceachern36 »

A question for you experts. I traded away an 09 Ric and regretting it. I'm now in the process of replacing it. Was offered one from 97 and waned to know if there are any significant differences between 97 and 09. Pickups, neck width? Any tail lift problems back in 97? It looks like there is a little tail lift in the pics. I would think they would be almost the same minus the push pull cap thing. Thanks for any info/advise.
User avatar
walrus
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 2:27 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by walrus »

They are basically the same with these few differences.
The 1997 doesn't have full width neck inlays, adjustable pole pieces on pickups, walnut ends on headstock, push pull treble tone knob. The neck is probably thicker on the 97, depending on when in 09 yours was from. The 09s, beginning in April, have gotten thinner and use a 2 piece construction.
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by jmceachern36 »

My 09 neck actually felt chunky. Espesially compared to my 89 which is perfect!
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by RobRick »

Why not just get another 09? Just asking. :D
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by jmceachern36 »

I'm doing a trade. I'd go get a new one but they give much less for a trade. Although I may anyway. I'd actually prefer that.
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by RobRick »

I say, get what you REALLY want. In the end, you won't regret it.
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by jmceachern36 »

Good point. There are 2 brand new Fireglo's in my area! That's what I want.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 97 to current

Post by johnallg »

The '97 neck won't be bigger fretboard to back of neck than the '09 you had, and might be a tad smaller.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 97 to current

Post by jps »

RobRick wrote:I say, get what you REALLY want. In the end, you won't regret it.
+1
User avatar
stevebasshead
Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:34 am

Re: 97 to current

Post by stevebasshead »

RobRick wrote:I say, get what you REALLY want. In the end, you won't regret it.
+1 from me too. It's been my experience that it's cheaper in the long run too.

Of course the alternative is to be poorer but to have had lots more Rics...so maybe there's something to be said for that approach too :lol:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 97 to current

Post by jps »

stevebasshead wrote:
RobRick wrote:I say, get what you REALLY want. In the end, you won't regret it.
+1 from me too. It's been my experience that it's cheaper in the long run too.
Does that apply to spouses, also? :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”