VVT Reversification

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

VVT Reversification

Post by tmossman »

Has anyone reversed their VVT mod on a 4004? Specifically what toggle switch did you use for the new larger hole? I really like the C&K switch that comes stock with the 4004's, but they don't make one in a larger diameter.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by aceonbass »

I find the mini toggle in the 4004 to be pretty wimpy, so when I use a switch, I use a Switchcraft switch for a Les Paul (gotta drill the hole out though). I'm surprised that you'd wanna change back as I've found the VVT setup gives more tonal possibilities. Try replacing the volume controls with 500K push-pulls so you can short out a coil on each of your HB1's for even more tonal possibilities. I did this on John Luke's "4004/2 V57" bass.
User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by tmossman »

Thanks Dane that should work. I like the the "wimpy" toggle because it is so unobtrusive. I tend to play in a very animated manner at times and the larger toggles get hit inadvertently.

Loved the VVT, but I am switching to twin stacked 500k V&T with a iiipopes modified version of the 4004cjj wiring. Coil cuts included.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by cassius987 »

I'm probably the only person in the world who feels this way but I really like the stock wiring of the 4004... the simplicity is kind of its strength. Plus it keeps the impedance loading from getting out of hand without using huge R-value pots.
User avatar
superdick2112
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:46 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by superdick2112 »

Todd, as someone who is contemplating wiring his 4004Cii for VVT, I'm curious as to why you want to switch yours back? Any issues I should be aware of before I modify mine?
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by cjj »

For the 4004Cjjv2 I'm thinking of going to triple stacked knobs...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by woodyng »

i have been really pleased with my VVT setup,used a matching 500k 2nd volume,no issues,just very nice to be able to roll the neck pickup off a tad. i did not care for the mini toggle,but i also am not especially fond of toggles in general.
User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by tmossman »

superdick2112 wrote:Todd, as someone who is contemplating wiring his 4004Cii for VVT, I'm curious as to why you want to switch yours back? Any issues I should be aware of before I modify mine?
I love the VVT mod. I am not switching it back, just adding another T. Plus coil cut and more. My Laredo is my go to studio bass and I want it to be as flexible as possible. If I modded a stock 4004 today I would leave the factory toggle and add two stacked pots (VTVT).
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by aceonbass »

Are you doing the coil cut with push-pull pots or separate switches? Toggles similar if not the same as the one RIC uses are available at BassPartsResource. What will be the eventual layout of your control setup Todd, and how 'bout a pic of that bass?
User avatar
coolhandjjl
Intermediate Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by coolhandjjl »

Humbucking to single coil mode is a great option. I didn't really consider it until Dane suggested it, and am glad I opted for it. Dane wired my volume pots with the push/pull pots keeping the higher quality pots for tone.
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by tmossman »

aceonbass wrote:Are you doing the coil cut with push-pull pots or separate switches? Toggles similar if not the same as the one RIC uses are available at BassPartsResource. What will be the eventual layout of your control setup Todd, and how 'bout a pic of that bass?
I have three switches on the control cover. A coil cut for each pickup and a circuit change switch like the cjj (v1 :shock:) mod. Pics to follow once I figure out the toggle part number, order and install it.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by jps »

An alternative arrangement would be two individual volume controls with stacked tone controls, or do you want the pickup toggle switch back on the bass? The electronics that Joe Zon added to my former fretted ZON Sonus 5/1.2 (my designation) had that setup, with pull switches on the volume controls for switching the pickups from series to parallel.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by rickenbrother »

cassius987 wrote:I'm probably the only person in the world who feels this way but I really like the stock wiring of the 4004... the simplicity is kind of its strength. Plus it keeps the impedance loading from getting out of hand without using huge R-value pots.
Sorry Joshua, but I'm right there with ya! :wink:
I think Tony Cabibe felt the same way when he had his 4004Cii, that he now misses a whole lot!
I also like the smaller toggle switch for the reasons being that it's smaller, it looks neater, simpler, takes up less room, not to interrupt the pretty wood and the toggle doesn't take the brunt of getting hit when ever the 4004 shifts back to front in it's case.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by tmossman »

cassius987 wrote:I'm probably the only person in the world who feels this way but I really like the stock wiring of the 4004... the simplicity is kind of its strength. Plus it keeps the impedance loading from getting out of hand without using huge R-value pots.
As a gigging bass I would agree with you as well. I can get more than enough sounds out of a stock 4004 to make me happy. My desire for instant sound change is when recording at home. I found myself swapping basses WAY too often chasing a sound that I thought MIGHT be there. I would wonder if a (insert RIC pickup option here) would sound better for a song and swap basses. One night I had six basses out chasing a sound and decided I had enough. I decided then to wire the Laredo in a super configurable manner to let me keep one bass active and my life simpler.

Stock 4004's rule. However the mods make me happy and I am sure 99% of my happiness is placebo effect. But I really like my brain to at least think it is happy.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: VVT Reversification

Post by johnallg »

tmossman wrote:But I really like my brain to at least think it is happy.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I hear ya!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”