Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
chai-man
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:24 am

Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by chai-man »

I've always wondered about weight of vintage Ricks - the Capri/330/335/360 range. What are average guitar weights like? What sort of range is there in weights within the same model?

Obviously denser woods give a higher weight for a given model (since components will, I assume, be less variable in weight), but is there any clear relationship between wood density (hence weight) and tonal quality of the guitar, both acoustically and electrically? And do the guitars get lighter with age as they lose moisture?
User avatar
sys700
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:47 am
Contact:

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by sys700 »

I had two 330/12's from 1966. One was significantly heavier than the other due to the top thickness (and long pole toasters) :-). Would be interesting to see values from various months/years.
1964 FireGlo 330S (domestic 1997 w/trapeze)
1966 FireGlo 330/12 (Paul W. 360/12OS conversion)
1968 FireGlo 360F
1972 FireGlo 4001
1973 FireGlo 4001
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by jingle_jangle »

I wish I had taken the time to weigh (and thoroughly document) every old Rick I've had the pleasure of working on.

I can say, however, that older Capris (full-bodied) weigh more than modern 330s and 360. The difference is significant and noticeable, but I don't have a number. I'd assume that this makes them more resonant in some frequencies, too. Performance when amplified is too much a combination of factors, however...

Let's weigh in!
User avatar
sys700
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:47 am
Contact:

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by sys700 »

Well, you could weight mine Paul, since you have it! :-)
1964 FireGlo 330S (domestic 1997 w/trapeze)
1966 FireGlo 330/12 (Paul W. 360/12OS conversion)
1968 FireGlo 360F
1972 FireGlo 4001
1973 FireGlo 4001
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by libratune »

Here are some weigh-ins of Capris and some other Rick models:

Year P/ups Model TP Weight--Lb/oz
Capris

1958 2 360 Capri ATG [no ROS] Trapeze 6/13
1959 2 335 Capri FG/Red [no ROS] Kauffman 7/6
1960 2 360 Capri FG TP Trapeze 7/8
1958/9 2 365 Capri ATG/FG [no ROS] Accent 7/10
1959 3 345 Capri FG Mahogany [no ROS] Kauffman 7/14
1960 3 375 Capri MG Kauffman 7/14
1960 2 365 Capri FG Accent 7/15
1958/9 2 365 Capri ATG/FG Accent 7/15

Other Ricks

1965 2 360-12 NS MG R 7/8
1966 2 330-6 MG R 7/10
1964 2 1993-12 FG Trapeze 7/11
1996 2 360V64 MG Trapeze 7/11

Main "weight-adding" variables seem to be internal bracing, VB TP, extra p/up (3.7 oz.) and 330 v 360NS body design. ROS with extra jack and longer plate, etc. probably adds about an ounce.
User avatar
8mileshigh
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by 8mileshigh »

But the very early Alder body Capris weigh in at a fraction over 5lbs........they are SUPER light!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Weight of vintage rickenbackers

Post by jingle_jangle »

I'm always amazed at the amount of heft the tuners, pickups, stuffed guard, and tailpiece will add. This means that the raw bodies on those alder Capris must be around 3 pounds.

I started restoring a Blackstar awhile back. VERY heavy; haven't weighed it--this is subjective, but I'd say 11 pounds or more.

The maple, once stripped, was like a bowling alley--the densest maple I've seen on a "newer" Rick. I'm guessing huge resonance and sustain.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”