ran my 360 and 381 6s through a princeton reverb clone and a supro replica
clean settings with equalizer on the princeton and janglebox on the supro
oh my!
the ultimate r-o-r setup must be a ric 12 str with a janglebox on each amp!
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
You got that right!eljayski wrote:
the ultimate r-o-r setup must be a ric 12 str with a janglebox on each amp!
I thought the point of ROS was to run both signals independently to craft a new baseline sound. I guess, though, there's nothing wrong with dropping out one part of the signal for solo sections, etc. You might want a volume pedal on the channel to solo to keep the output where you want it.aceonbass wrote:So whaddaya do when you decide to solo a pickup when you're running ROS and one channel drops out?
My comment doesn't apply to guitars?johnallg wrote:Larry and Jim play guitars.
Absolutely--that's an artistic choice you have to make. The alternative is equally cool though because it's basically two guitars in one, since the pickups don't "talk" to each other at all.aceonbass wrote:I ran ROS for awhile, but eventually realized that running a mono signal into a stereo effects processor sounds more impressive due to the "3D" effect that things like chorus, phasing, flanging, and slap back delay produces.
I read the bassline with a different meaning...cassius987 wrote:My comment doesn't apply to guitars?johnallg wrote:Larry and Jim play guitars.
Neck pickup - Carvin 600 watt head with crossover running mids to a 2x10 and lows to a 1x15. This setup is kept clean for a nice, solid underlying bass tone.Daved wrote:I'd be curious to hear from any bassists who are using ROS, what gear they're using and what types of music they play. Having just taken delivery of my 4003 today, I plan to experiment with ROS @ home and then try it out on a gig soon.