I really like the aesthetics of a highly-figured maple top on a vintage Rickenbacker, but ultimately what I want in a guitar is tone. In my experience, on the guitars I've owned, the tops with less figuring sounded better. I'm wondering if this is an anomaly, or if there's some truth to it. Most great sounding acoustic guitars seem to have a non-quilted top. Just curious if this also translates over to Rickenbacker tops or not?
This also brings up another question regarding 2-piece tops vs. 3-piece tops. It seems like a pickup straddling two different pieces of wood would be tonally inferior to a pickup centered on a solid piece of wood with two wings. I notice Rickenbacker changed to 2-piece tops in mid-66 for whatever reason and those guitars sound a bit different than the earlier 2-piece top Ricks. Have others noticed this? Do the modern C63 guitars have 2 or 3-piece tops?
Figured vs. Plain-top Rickenbackers
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Figured vs. Plain-top Rickenbackers
1964 FireGlo 330S (domestic 1997 w/trapeze)
1966 FireGlo 330/12 (Paul W. 360/12OS conversion)
1968 FireGlo 360F
1972 FireGlo 4001
1973 FireGlo 4001
1966 FireGlo 330/12 (Paul W. 360/12OS conversion)
1968 FireGlo 360F
1972 FireGlo 4001
1973 FireGlo 4001
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Figured vs. Plain-top Rickenbackers
Two-piece, IIRC.
the tonal difference between figured and non-figured tops might have to do with differing density of the wood between the two types.
the tonal difference between figured and non-figured tops might have to do with differing density of the wood between the two types.
