1968 330

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

1968 330

Post by sloop_john_b »

I recently got this January '68 (HA, or the :lol: :lol: serial number) 330 FG:
DSC03594.JPG
DSC03595.JPG
DSC03598.JPG
DSC03599.JPG
And I just wanted to share how much I'm loving it! :D :D

It has had some work done, include the repair of a cracked heel, a fresh refret, and the removal of the gloss from the fretboard (PM me and I'll let you know who did they work - they did an absolutely phenomenal job). But the original Fireglo is untouched, and most of the guitar is original, including the tuners, harness, bridge, tail etc. I couldn't get it to come out in any photos, but there is some absolutely gorgeous figuring in the wood. The Fireglo is what I would consider the standard 60's Rick Fireglo, by which everything else should be judged. No gold plastic going on this one - this guitar is pure mid-60's and that's how it'll stay.

The pickups are new. I got it for a i'd-be-completely-insane-to-pass-it-up price due to the work done, but it was also sans pickups. I decided to go with a 7.4k scatterwound at the bridge, and a 4k-ish c58 flat pole toaster at the neck. Yes, there is a bit of a volume mismatch, but it's really not bad at all. The c58 toaster is warm and dark, and of course the 7.4k, with the cap inline, is brash and bold. Combine them and tweak the blender knob and there are a ton of unique but very usable sounds - and for me, that's saying a lot since I mostly play Gibsons.

I had been debating messing around with different pickup combinations - I even had FabGear stuff one of my spare Firebird pickups inside a Toaster cover - but for now, I rather like the fact that it doesn't sound like my other guitars. It just sounds so damn good.

The action is nice and low, with some room to spare on the bridge. That's a great sign. It hasn't had a neck reset either, despite the other work that's been done to it. The new frets and faster fretboard (no thick shlock) really allows me to stretch out and play anything I want on this thing with ease. The only thingk I'ms till getting used to is the thinner nut width. It sustains really well too - I haven't had any desire to perform the Tune-o-Matic bridge mod to this one, though I may in the future just because I like to tweak things.

Just wanted to say that after a few busts, this guitar has really restored my faith in vintage Ricks. I really found a good one and I can't tell you how thrilling that is. :D
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 330

Post by kennyhowes »

NICE
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1968 330

Post by JakeK »

Welcome back to Rics, JB. This one is beautiful as can be. You said you had a '68 330 that company you mentioned did a refinish for you. Is this it? (Ignore my stupidity)
Last edited by JakeK on Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: 1968 330

Post by Danotron »

Very cool!

Vintage guitars that you actually play at gigs are the best 8)

They just "feel" right (and look amazing).

Congratulations.
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by scotty »

Congrats John 8) Beautiful
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by sloop_john_b »

JakeK wrote:Welcome back to Rics, JB. This one is beautiful as can be. You said you had a '68 330 that company you mentioned did a refinish for you. Is this it? (Ignore my stupidity)
Not a refin Jake, but just the work I specified. That FG is all original.
Last edited by sloop_john_b on Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1968 330

Post by JakeK »

Thanks for the info and my post edited for more generic terms.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by sloop_john_b »

JakeK wrote:Thanks for the info and my post edited for more generic terms.
Cheers, wouldn't want to anger upper management. :wink:
crimson_dynamo
New member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:43 pm
Contact:

Re: 1968 330

Post by crimson_dynamo »

Man, that is a beauty!
Kick out the style, bring back the Jam.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 1968 330

Post by collin »

Glad you saw the light again, John --- enjoy, it's a stunner! :)
User avatar
chronictown
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 12:09 pm

Re: 1968 330

Post by chronictown »

Congrats, John - she's a beauty! :D
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by godber »

She's got a nice face! Lovely colour - that pool shot is just great. Congrats John.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by jps »

Congrats, John! Very nice 330. I take it it and you survived Irene?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1968 330

Post by sloop_john_b »

jps wrote:Congrats, John! Very nice 330. I take it it and you survived Irene?
Yes we did! Some minor flooding but the guitars were well-protected. :D
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: 1968 330

Post by ozover50 »

Nice one, JB..... real purty! :D
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”